An article about child well-being in different countries:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6359363.stm
2007-02-13 21:58:41 · 4 answers · asked by Jokin' Jo 3 in Social Science ➔ Sociology
Well now that I have clicked the link (in the article) which shows the full report, I see that Australia is an "OECD country with insufficient data to be included in the overview".
I guess that brings a new question - why is there insufficient data? Did Australia not participate fully or did UNICEF not research Australia fully?
2007-02-13 22:10:38 · update #1
PS: Austria is not Australia!
2007-02-13 22:13:29 · update #2
Dont worry about these wankers ..these are do gooders trying to justify their existance whilst on a junket.sucking on the UNICEF tit
The fact they didnt include Australia is either a result of there lazines,stupidity or beligerance
the fact that we are not not on there radar is a non event, who really listens to these diicks any way?.
Who cares what an over educated rable on a united nations junket think , they will never be relevant anyway.
Parasites and do gooder parasites will never prosper...fuuck the lot of them.
they are a bigger burden and drain on society than those they claim to champion.
How many dinners and "meetings " did this scum have to come upo with these findings...and what does it matter. Scum suckers all
Chardonney socialists with credit cards...may they rot in hell...all of them
OZZZIE OZZIE OZZIE! and fuuck the do-gooders
2007-02-13 23:21:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Australia was not considered in the same league as the stutus of Australia...its not fair but thats the way of this busy world
2007-02-14 07:25:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes Australia was!
2007-02-14 06:03:38 · answer #3 · answered by Eat My Shorts 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
australia, it is!
2007-02-14 06:11:13 · answer #4 · answered by livinhapi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋