English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

hope earnst T Php THE , ab80 ,baby girl I, ginger 1, tumblewee, silly gorbie, republica,etc got me this time or may be they still cant see the truth.

2007-02-13 21:17:57 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

they already did

2007-02-13 21:23:40 · answer #1 · answered by xapao 5 · 0 0

9/11 was an inside job.

Even if the intelligence agencies missed everything (funny...about 15 other countries seemed to have figured it out...Google it) that still doesn't explain why NORAD was stood down, why the Twin Towers collapsed (fire did not bring down those buildings), how the most defended building in the world -- the Pentagon -- was hit. Nor does it explain why the day before Sept. 11 thousands and thousands of put options were placed on American Airlines and Delta stock. Nor does it explain why on Sept. 11, a day when trans-Continental flights from the East Coast were a near 100% capacity the computers at American AND Delta malfunctioned for the four planes that were hijacked and because of that they were only at 20% capacity.

And day of coincidences: NORAD just HAPPENED by COINCIDENCE be conducting a training exercise on Sept. 11 that dealt with planes being hijacked and used as missiles against the Twin Towers and the Pentagon. Google it. It's real. But isn't it strange that NORAD would be running that exact drill at the exact time that those planes were hijacked?

Coincidence number two would have to be that the plane that hit the Pentagon just HAPPENED to hit the one side of the building that was being renovated and upgrade. So there wasn't that many people on that particular side of the building. Odd.

And Coincidence number three: It seems that in New York on Sept. 11, 2001 if a building was owned by Larry Silverstein it "collapsed." The entire World Trade Center complex was purchased by Larry Silverstein a few months before the attack. Surprisingly though only HIS buildings were destroyed. Yet if you look at pictures from that day ALL of the buildings around the Twin Towers NOT owned by Silverstein were heavily damaged. But they didn't fall down. I find that very odd indeed.

Sure, it's highly possible that our intelligence agencies missed it. But why did they ignore the warnings from all of the foreign intelligence agencies? Why was NORAD stood down? How did these buildings collapse from fire when NO steel building in the HISTORY of steel buildings ever collapsed from fire? Compare the videos from the Twin Towers to the Windsor Madrid building that caught fire in 1995. It was a RAGING inferno for 26 HOURS but didn't fall down. But the Twin Towers smoked for 90 minutes and fell. Something doesn't add up.

2007-02-13 21:46:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Louis Freeh – Director of the FBI, 1993 - 2001. Former U.S. District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, appointed by President George H.W. Bush. Former Deputy United States Attorney in New York. Former FBI agent. Former officer in the United States Army JAG Corps Reserve.

Essay An Incomplete Investigation - Why did the 9/11 Commission ignore "Able Danger"? Wall Street Journal 11/17/05: "Even the most junior investigator would immediately know that the name and photo ID of Atta in 2000 is precisely the kind of tactical intelligence the FBI has many times employed to prevent attacks and arrest terrorists. Yet the 9/11 Commission inexplicably concluded that it "was not historically significant." This astounding conclusion--in combination with the failure to investigate Able Danger and incorporate it into its findings--raises serious challenges to the commission's credibility and, if the facts prove out, might just render the commission historically insignificant itself. … No wonder the 9/11 families were outraged by these revelations and called for a "new" commission to investigate." http://www.opin


Editor's note: The 9/11 Commission Report asserts that only three of the alleged hijackers were known to U.S. intelligence agencies prior to 9/11; Nawaf al-Hazmi, Salem al-Hazmi, and Khalid al-Mihdar. There is no mention in the Report that the names and photographs of alleged hijacker Marwan al-Shehhi and alleged ring-leader Mohamed Atta had been identified by the Department of Defense antiterrorist program known as Able Danger more than a year prior to 9/11 and that they were known to be affiliates of al-Qaida. Able Danger also identified Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdar. http://www.foxnews.com. See also Rep. Curt Weldon, Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, Capt. Scott J. Phillpott, Major Erik Kleinsmith, and James D. Smith.


Bio: http://www.fbi.gov/libref/directors/freeh.htm







Edward L. Peck – Deputy Director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism under Ronald Reagan. Former Deputy Coordinator, Covert Intelligence Programs at the State Department. U.S. Ambassador and Chief of Mission to Iraq (1977 - 1980). 32-year veteran of the Foreign Service.

Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11:
"We want truthful answers to question. … As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:
An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry." http://www.911truth.org/article



Bio: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Peck

2007-02-13 21:35:16 · answer #3 · answered by dstr 6 · 1 0

confident, the two have been attacked Sept. 11, 2001. there have been 2 planes that hit the twin towers, yet another airplane hit the pentagon, and yet yet another airplane grew to become into headed to the White homestead or Capital and the passengers on board refused to allow this to handed off so they attacked the terrorists on board and extra the airplane down in a field (i think of in PA). Our President grew to become into in a college lecture room on the time examining to the youngsters whilst a secret service Agent went in and whispered to him related to the attack. you may no longer tell that President Bush (George W.) had basically rec'd. undesirable information.

2016-10-02 03:02:20 · answer #4 · answered by alarid 4 · 0 0

It wasn't a matter of "deceiving" U.S. intelligence sources, it was the fact that U.S. intelligence has so many bits of intelligence to process and decipher. If information on the upcoming attacks had been processed, they could certainly have been prevented, but in this particular case, the timing was unfortunately off.

2007-02-13 21:22:12 · answer #5 · answered by C J 6 · 2 0

By "gorbie" are you referring to Mikhail Gorbachev? Because I'd like his Y! messenger screen name if you have it.

2007-02-13 21:24:28 · answer #6 · answered by Bread Crumb Maloy 3 · 0 0

That was not the first attack that terrorist made on Americans'. Information was put on President Bush's desk, Information he elected not to look at.
People can get all the information in the world, it doesn't do crap unless the right people look at it and act on those steps to prevent it.
See the truth. I seen the truth when BEN LADIN ADMITTED TO IT !!!

2007-02-13 22:08:47 · answer #7 · answered by wondermom 6 · 2 3

I honestly dont care about the towers. Towers can be rebuilt! Im a muslim and if you feel sorry for the victims in NY, think about my bros and sis in Iraq instead. So many more people dies since Bush and Blair likes to set the agenda for the world. I have news for them, they do not. Thats why they do not win.

2007-02-13 21:55:59 · answer #8 · answered by Brantalla L 1 · 1 3

This has already happened, you're not exactly Nostradamus here. Try predicting something when you ask if it could possibly happen. That is like saying "could Poland be attacked by Germany in 1939?"

2007-02-13 21:23:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

It's not a matter of seeing the truth, it's more of a matter to understand just what the heck are you talking about .

Can terrorists deceive ? Yes they do .

2007-02-13 22:19:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

America admits there was an intelligent failure..That's well known..It could happen again to any country at any time regardless of their intelligence...!

2007-02-13 21:24:11 · answer #11 · answered by dadacoolone 5 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers