English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-13 19:47:10 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Wrestling

17 answers

defenately! raw is better bcuz lyk what i just said on the other topic..raw has the veteran superstars such as Cena,DX,rated RKO,hulk hogan,the rock,stone cold...well rocky,austin and hogan is at least showing on Raw in several times..wich makes monday night raw gets higher ratings and more viewers...compared to SD that catches all the new comers also the divas on raw are the veterans..again compared to SD that has all the new divas but to tell you Ashley is Hot! yeh! BUT! don't forget smackdown also got legendary and good wrestlers like the undertaker,batista,rey mysterio,benoit... wich is not bad for the smackdown rosters but still Raw has more excitement thyan SD....hope that Smackdown can come back to their previous format.so that theres no compititions.......that's all.

2007-02-15 22:17:44 · answer #1 · answered by Gothic Knight *Xeron* (Part Timer) 7 · 0 0

Raw is not better than Smackdown in my view because of who the champion is. Raw is not even better than I Love New York, and that's a fact, look at the ratings. Now if you want crazy, insane, and death defying wrestling, don't go to Raw, Smackdown, or ECW because Vince has turned World Wrestling Entertainment into We Won't Entertain. So if you want to know which wrestling is better out of Raw & Smackdown, go with Smackdown because it has Batista, Finlay, Booker T (King Booker), Chavo, Benoit, Rey Mysterio, Kane, Undertaker, Gregory Helms, JBL, and so much more people that will give you your money's worth. And that's a proven fact.

2007-02-14 07:01:44 · answer #2 · answered by TJ 1 · 0 1

Absolutely YES.....RAW is better than SmackDown!.....for a simple reason that RAW is the flagship show and everything big takes place on Monday Night RAW.

The only reason SmackDown! is alive, is because Undertaker is on it. How ironic?? The DEADMAN is why SmackDown! is ALIVE.....

2007-02-14 03:59:15 · answer #3 · answered by Cable 3 · 1 1

i think its much better i gave smackdown away when the Chavo storyline wouldn't go away then i saw a Little green man under the ring and then Vito in a dress not to mention King Booker

2007-02-14 05:38:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

yes because smackdown really has no main eventers and it really needs a tag team divison and some more good looking divas

2007-02-14 07:58:24 · answer #5 · answered by crazziegrl14 5 · 0 0

YES!

As i said/answered before, it's RAW and ONLY RAW and my reasons are perfectly clear - i repeat, cause Shawn Michaels and Mickie James are on it!!!

do i need to repeat that?

Shawn Michaels - Next Champ

2007-02-14 05:34:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No its the same people going back and forth like they don't travel together and work for the same dude. I can't get into it. I love good Wrestiling, but this is getting old. WWe is over-stuffed with great talent that they must do the lame 3 brands thing. They all work together. Getting old

2007-02-14 04:41:16 · answer #7 · answered by fastfreedombailbonds 4 · 0 1

yea but smackdown is cool too better than ecw,tna,wsx

2007-02-14 03:54:22 · answer #8 · answered by Tiffanyyyy:) 4 · 1 1

raw have more drama

2007-02-14 15:36:27 · answer #9 · answered by jamaican babe 7 · 0 0

RAW is way better but as we all know, all are FAKE.... I prefer UFC....

2007-02-14 04:37:45 · answer #10 · answered by Khairudin Bin Salim 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers