I have done both. but to tell you the truth. The text is pretty bad. Its misogynistic and boils down to a guide on how to be a good wife/ mistress. The book I believe is a waste of time. There are better books on sex out there than this. I think it is overrated and even though you can get a thing or two out of it.... there are better sources for this kind of information. Especially practice ;)
2007-02-13 19:22:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Arabian Witch 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
i read the gay kama sutra and looked at the pictures!
2007-02-14 03:03:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nowadays, the pictures are nothing to look at. There's more exciting stuff on Saturday morning TV.
If you want to check it out, though, it's available from Project Gutenberg for free:
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/14609
2007-02-14 03:03:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by T J 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Looked at the pics and then read only on the ones that I was interested in trying out. Later, I did read more of it...but I was alone at those moments.
2007-02-14 03:03:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you look at pictures you don't even know what they were doing.
Only feel irresistible on what others were doing.
Should learn to read then practice make perfect in planet of apes.
Not sex education in school that ended up as pornography in schools in planet of apes.
2007-02-14 03:06:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I second Arabian Witch. I was surprised at how boring the text actually was. I only read bits of it, though. It was more of a "how to manipulate your woman" lesson for the man.
2007-02-14 05:02:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Globetrotter 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think I just looked at the pictures.
I cant remember reading anything besides the names of the positions.
Ha.
2007-02-14 03:02:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by p0pr0xy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pictures only I make up my own words.
#
2007-02-14 09:06:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mrs. Shrek 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have read it and found it discouraging,you have to have the flexibility of Gumby for those positions.
2007-02-14 06:44:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Candi Apples 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pictures, dude. it's not Dr Seuss.
2007-02-14 03:21:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Orion Quest 6
·
0⤊
0⤋