shane watson or cameron white? any reasons why u'd prefer one or the other?
2007-02-13 18:23:40 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
personally i think the jury is still out on both of these players but if i had to choose one i'd probably go for shane watson,this is hard for me to say being a victorian but watson is averaging more with the bat and his bowling is alot better than whites at the moment
cameron white has made 85 runs from 13 innings and his economy rate with the ball is up around 6.00 an over plus he has only taken 4 wickets-just not good enough to be picked.
2007-02-14 00:23:42 · answer #1 · answered by FORKY 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
from the basis on current form it should be cameron white - his batting prowess is much better than shane's but shane's versatility in the bowling may be the reason why the selectors picked him. cameron has raw talent and can hit the ball very well. his batting figures are way better than shane's, and his leg-spinners are something the Aussie side desperately needs (since the departure of warnie).
My vote is Cameron - youth and talent in his favour.
But the selectors always seem to be reluctant selecting Victorians to play!
2007-02-14 23:53:08 · answer #2 · answered by taxi1605 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
would go with shane watson. havent heard of cameron white.
2007-02-14 03:59:32 · answer #3 · answered by Charu Chandra Goel 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
shane watson.he has proved himself as a good player with bat and ball.Can hit some runs in lower order
2007-02-14 07:21:54 · answer #4 · answered by Soham N 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
watson
2007-02-15 00:41:40 · answer #5 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋