Leinart..he knows how to win (except for the Rose Bowl 2006) and he's got talent, Cutler might come close and Young is fun to watch, but I don't regard Cutler that highly since he's from a less competitive college program and reminds me of Jake Plummer and Young will fade out like Daunte Culpepper, Michael Vick, and the other dual threat quarterbacks
2007-02-13 18:44:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by A. Lee 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
I'm going to go with Vince Young because he's around a winning environment and already seems to have earned the trust of his teammates. Leinart has the capability to get it done but it's going to take a lot of work in Arizona. We'll get a better idea about Jay Cutler this coming season.
2007-02-15 10:30:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by RichMac82 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd go with Matt Leinart. Vince Young is fun to watch, but his style of play doesn't win championships in the NFL. And Cutler is just not on the same level as Leinart.
2007-02-14 02:23:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I say Leinart. He's a proven winner, he got to learn from Carson Palmer, and has the maturity of a 30 something. It's that simple. I have yet to fully believe all the Vince Young hype, but I think he's got some potential to be good.
My problem is with Cutler...I have to admit I didn't watch any Vanderbuilt games. Nor did I want to. I don't know much about him and not so sure I care to.
2007-02-14 07:26:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jenn R 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Leinart
2007-02-15 03:30:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by mauiman240 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say Cutler simply because he has Shanahan (an ex QB coach who has coached the likes of Elway, Montana, Steve Young) and Cutler again because he's part of a much better team and organization than the other two.
2007-02-14 08:46:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Jay Cutler will. He has a crazy strong arm and he is with a good franchise. The other two should do well also, but Cutler has the most upside.
2007-02-14 07:50:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Drunk365 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
What's a carrer? If you meant career, Matt Leinart.
2007-02-14 05:45:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by stan l 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Vince Young. He has was Vick doesn't. The guy doesn't take losing for an answer. It's more then just the running abilty. He has a better work ethic and more character then Vick. And we all saw how good of a guy Vick was this year off the field.
2007-02-14 02:33:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Deep In The Woods 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
i'm going to say vince young, because he's got a good arm and can actually throw it(zip it, float it, whatever the situation calls for), and the agility and awareness to know when to run the ball... don't get me wrong, i do think the other two will have good careers also, but i think tennessee is on the rise
2007-02-14 02:57:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by NASER™ 4
·
0⤊
1⤋