2007-02-13 18:11:21 · 5 answers · asked by Captain 1 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Yep. I think the Nets might blow their team up also trading Vince Carter and then starting over. Keep your eyes on the Cavs who might get involved.
For more on the Nets, Cavs and the NBA, check this site out. http://factipedia.com/sportsblogs/nba.html
2007-02-13 18:25:03 · answer #1 · answered by Cleopatra S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
whats up answer second, This commerce difficulty is really, really unlikely. even besides the undeniable fact that Kenyon Martin has a international of skills there's a rationalization why New Jersey enable him bypass- and he's not any longer an similar participant he grow to be at the same time as the Nets were in the finals many years in the past- that that they had quite enable their modern bigs Josh Boone and Sean Williams improve. Plus area of the reason the Nets would commerce Jason Kidd is to disencumber capspace- Kenyon nonetheless has 4 years left on his settlement- that that they had be more beneficial advantageous off holding Kidd letting his settlement expire and having that money freed up ($19-$21 mil.) quite of locking up $14 mill of that on a participant that they don't need. The numbers workout besides the undeniable fact that the deal does no longer make experience at fascinated about the Nets. Nickster
2016-12-04 03:59:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They might. But i think they still owe it to themselves to give it a shot the way the east is so wide open right now. The rumor is that they might trade him to the Lakers. That deal will do wonders for the Lakers but won't be so good for the Nets. They're gonna be giving the lakers an impact player and not getting one in return unless the Lakers throw in Bynum which of course they will not do. It's just not worth it
2007-02-14 02:30:38 · answer #3 · answered by #15mwu 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ESPN Podcast yesterday said Kidd might go to Lakers (bussanut) and Carter might go to Orlando. If they deal anybody, it'll be Carter first and by virtue Kidd would have to go also. They might move Carter (and then Kidd) cause Carter is probably gonna opt out of his contract come summer. They need to get something for him cause he prolly isnt going back to the nets.
2007-02-13 19:50:58 · answer #4 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would think it would be virtually impossible to get rid of kidd, with his contract structured the way it is. it would take some mountain moving to get him out of town. also, what team in their right mind would take kidd with the situation with his old lady the way it is. that lady is a freak.
2007-02-14 02:53:15 · answer #5 · answered by Heavy C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋