a, b or both a & b?
2007-02-13 17:33:47 · 21 answers · asked by Kerbang! 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'll just say that Bush is what he is. He doesn't have a choice in the matter. People that voted for Bush had a choice.
2007-02-13 17:43:01 · answer #1 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Paradoxical... GWBush did vote for GWBush so both a & b. He has had a first hand account of his own stupidity. Although he might not be smart enough to fully comprehend his lack of intelligence, he surely knew that Kerry and Gore were much smarter than him. The voter that voted for Bush might just be a victim of Fox News or a broken voting machine. GWBush, on the hand, has to live with himself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKQ098sOpJ8
2007-02-13 19:47:35 · answer #2 · answered by Jake B 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In 2000 GW Bush was appointed not elected thanks to his brother, Kathleen Harris and the Courts. The shock is what drove Al Gore mad. The dumb voters were the ones who voted for Nader and split the moderate vote.
In 2004 the Dems were the stupid ones in believing that someone as two faced and devoid of personality as John Kerry could win over the floating voters.
2007-02-13 17:55:54 · answer #3 · answered by kwilfort 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in case you're touching on the Republicans as lemmings and you're proposing your self as somebody who has constantly voted for the ultimate individual then this would desire to be your first time to vote. sometimes we p.c. a sturdy individual for the interest like Harry Truman or Ronald Reagan yet lots of the time we p.c. a mediocre type who gets via without screwing up too undesirable. and then sometimes we p.c. an exceedingly undesirable one like Jimmy Carter or George Bush. So it seems to me like human beings in the two events could make a mistake and this time provided that maximum individuals are vote casting for the guy via fact she is a woman, he's black and he's a war hero and not on matters we could be in for greater durable cases.
2016-10-02 02:54:05 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're the reason liberals have been unable to shed that pesky "elitist" label.
That's right, it's your fault, exclusively. How does that make you feel?
To answer your question, it depends upon the individual voter, and their reason for voting for Bush.
Religious Right? Smart, he's pushing your agenda.
The Wealthy? Smart, he's cutting your taxes.
Young men who really like killing things? Smart, he's giving you things (people) to kill.
Everyone has their reasons, man.
So, probably A.
2007-02-13 17:53:15 · answer #5 · answered by Richardson '08 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
GWBush. It is easy to decieve a populace for votes.
What is dumb is that the populace isn't taking responsibility for it's actions. If the majority doesn't want to be in Iraq, then make Bush get us the hell out of Iraq.
2007-02-13 17:43:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Well,it's amazing how rude some people are!
Can you amagine a group of individuals who
voted for a man who swore under oath,& even
said in public view " I did not have sex with that
woman" & found out to be lying could dare try
to sit in the seat of judging others who clearly
don't agree with them? Is oral sex not sex?
Well,thanx for sharing this with us,but who looks
dumb now?
2007-02-13 19:20:42 · answer #7 · answered by babyd0ll621 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
oh... the "razar-sharp whit" of the Republcians strikes again...
"err, your stupidest"... wow, how creative... I didn't see that coming... did you... hahaha
but to your question.. I would say the voters... even most dumb people can recognize their own and have enough sense not to follow other fools...
but, these folks didn't even have that much sense...
2007-02-13 17:55:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you trying to make a John Kerry style joke?!?
2007-02-13 18:51:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
'Dumb' is very soft word for Bush!! He deserves more !
Voters are dumber who could'nt recognise him wht his intentions are, and had re-elected him !
2007-02-13 19:15:14 · answer #10 · answered by ★Roshni★ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋