I need to SPECIFICALLY know the following (it's for a paper I'm writing):
1 you believe the White House's Official Version
2 you now realize something is fishy about the story that was played on tv, but you still pretty much support the White House version
3 you believe some that at the very least there is was some sort of cover up, but you're not ready to say the government blew up the buildings
4 you don't care about what happened on 9/11and you're sick of people telling you to watch the 9/11 videos already
So what category do you fall in and why do you hate 9/11 truthers SO MUCH? Don't bother saying it's because they are kooks because we already know that's what you think.
The topic has gotten so much mainstream press recently (they mentioned it on The View of all places).
Once Loose Change Version III is released in theatres in a few months, it's going to be interesting how the public's reaction to that will be.
2007-02-13
17:32:53
·
13 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
There are a few of you that either the question went complely over your heads, or you didn't bother to read any of the follow up details to the question.
Or that I kindly asked that you not just say they're kooks or at least to expound on the topic. But thanks for your answers anyways they've been so enlightening.
2007-02-13
17:53:10 ·
update #1
I was there. I saw the planes hit. I saw the fire. I saw people leaping to their deaths rather than burn. I saw the buildings fall. Anything else is just lies created by sick men. If you believe in conspiracy theories put forth by these sick men, you are a sick person too, and may God have mercy on you. I never will.
2007-02-13 17:40:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
VERY SIMPLE REASON WHY THE WTC COLLAPSED: Hijacked 767 airliners traveling in excess of 450mph struck the WTC. The blast blew away the fire stopping that coated the trusses within the WTC super structure. At that point, over 24,000 gallons of jet fuel burned uncontrolled at 1500 - 2000 degrees for 56 minutes in tower 2 and 102 minutes in tower 1. The fire then weakened the steel trusses enough to cause a collapse. In tower 2 the top 20 floors collapsed on the bottom 90 floors, and in tower 1 the top 30 floors collapsed on the bottom 80 floors. The floor below could not withstand the weight of the falling floors above, and within 8 seconds all 110 stories collapsed as we all witnessed on the mornig of September 11th. Yes, it really is that simple.
2007-02-13 18:28:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Of course the View mentioned it. Rosie O'Donnell is a conspiracy nut herself.
Oh, and I fall into the #1- "Believe the official version." Had too many friends who died in the Pentagon, and my brother in law works with thermite. The conspiracy story doesn't add up, except for people who need the thrill of conspiracy to make their lives worth living. I also fall into half of the #4 choice- I DO care what happened on 9/11, AND I'm sick of people telling me to watch their conspiracy videos. I wasn't impressed by the alien autopsy either.
2007-02-13 17:39:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by lizardmama 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
no i do not believe in the white house offical version of the story. obiously there is a cover up. i believe that the government did it so israel, britian, america, and their european allies would have a reason to attack iraq. think about it. why would america attack iraq when there were no iraqis involved in 9/11. how is saddam and alquieda in cahoots. osama and saddam hated each other. osama said that saddam is not even a muslim because of his tyranical opression of muslims. saddam feared osama and osama's movement because it threatened is rein of power. then we move on to the simple fact if this war really was about terrorism why is it 20 million dollars an hour for the last 3 years have been pumped out of iraq every hour on the hour. i find it strange how the american tax dollars fund this war but yet all the prophets of the oil that the us is fighting for is going into privatlized oil companies instead of to the iraqi people. the money is not going towards the iraqis when it is their money. it is their oil. it is not even going towards the american people. how ever it is sad that the us tax payers money is going towards supposedly rebuilding iraq when all the money stolen from iraqi oil revenues was squandered by the worlds politicians. the answer is in front of everyones eyes. how ever the american people would rather live in ignorance and pretend like americans are doing the richous thing here. the proof is now america is trying to attack iran and syrai to gain even more control over the middle east and their oil reserves. hense the reason to back israel no matter what human rights violations they do. no matter how many un resolutions they break, and no matter how many dirty bombs the israelis use. this is one big game being played by the worlds most wealthiest. and we are just the pawns.
2007-02-13 17:55:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by wedjb 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
I think your tin-foil hat needs adjustment
Why do you hate the Moon Landing Hoax movement?
2007-02-13 17:36:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
0⤋
Its not 9-11 that we hate - its your tin hats that you wear. Stop spreading that loosechange all around, go to screwloosechange for another view also.
2007-02-13 17:41:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Why should i believe Alex jones? What credibility does he have? What has he ever been right on? You people aren't credible cause you can never prove what you claim. It's liberal spin.
2007-02-13 17:57:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
I don't hate the 911 Truth movement, I support it.
I believe the government at least had foreknowledge of the attacks and let it happen, and quite possibly actively participated in blowing up the buildings.
Ha, yeah we're supposed to believe that the plane impacts blew off all the fireproofing on the steel girders and then the kerosene jet fuel burned hot enough and long enough to soften them until they collapsed?
The steel was fireproofed with sprayed asbestos. You're telling me that the plane impact simply blew all that off of every square inch of steel, even in a confined area?
Moreover, the fires caused by the jet fuel weren't even hot enough to weaken UNFIREPROOFED STEEL. Metallurgic testing of almost 100 recovered WTC panels from the floors of impact indicated that ONLY 2 of them were subjected to temperatures greater than 250 degrees C. Steel doesn't even start weakening until it's exposed to almost 1000 degrees C! So golly, apparently less than 5% of the the steel was subjected to temperatures which didn't even come close to its weakening point in the first place!
Steel doesn't begin to melt until being exposed to temperatures around 3000 degrees C. Kerosene fuel, EVEN IN PERFECT CONDITIONS, can't burn hotter than around 1700 C! IT'S IMPOSSIBLE! And we know the kerosene fuel wasn't burning efficiently from all the heavy black smoke belching from the towers within 10 minutes of impact, not to mention most of it burned off within a few minutes in the first place! A kerosene fire burning in ideal conditions doesn't produce heavy carbon-rich black smoke!
Haha, keep on drinking the kool-aid if you want!
2007-02-13 17:39:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
6⤋
Loose Change making it to the theaters only proves one thing. It proves that Bush is desperate to declare Marial Law. Because once the mainstream people really believe the TRUTH, all hell is going to break loose.
They, the government, is just dying to fill up those concentration camps they've been building. The suckers will fill them. it is all becoming quite clear.
2007-02-13 17:39:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by sirdoctorfine 2
·
0⤊
6⤋
yes....government hired arabs or whatever they are to hijack a plane and fly into the trade centers....that should not even be an option...
of course im being sarcastic... #3..is ridiculous
2007-02-13 17:37:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋