2007-02-13 17:26:09 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Baseball
I think he was for real. If he wasn't he would have had a real bad second half...but he didn't. Just a late bloomer and a solid player for the Marlins. Not bad for a Rule 5 guy.
For more on the Marlins and MLB, check this site out. http://www.factipedia.com/sportsblogs/mlb.html
2007-02-13 17:30:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dan Uggla is not a fluke. Good MI man!
2007-02-14 03:41:51 · answer #2 · answered by Alex S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he's a fluke. if you look at his past numbers in minor league ball, he never had a season even close to what he accomplished at the major league level. many 1st year players have great 1st years and then slump tremendously because major league pitchers/coaches are smart; they realize the weaknesses in a batter. that's why you saw uggla slumping later in the year because the pitchers have caught up to him. he might be a decent 2b for years to come, but i doubt he'll have another season like he did in 2006. track record shows that he just had a career year in 2006.
www.fanfestconvention.com
2007-02-14 10:19:47 · answer #3 · answered by DJ 4 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I watched about 80% of the Marlins games last year. I think he's the real deal.
Go Fish!!
2007-02-14 08:49:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the guy can play!
2007-02-14 10:36:38 · answer #5 · answered by Jim G 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋