I have a HP print-scan-copy machine. As I know HP is cheaper than Epson whole cartridge of Epson is costlier than HP.
Same like upper distinguishable point I like to get specific difference between HP and Lexmark for its any Print-Scan-Fax-Copy version.
Just let me know the advantages and disadvantages of HP and Lexmark for their Print-Scan-Fax-Copy machines (Deskjet/ inkjets only not any laser printer)
2007-02-13 17:00:20 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet ➔ Hardware ➔ Printers
My Choice is hardly between HP and Lexmark.. help me to choose please.
2007-02-13 18:10:21 · update #1
of the two HP is far better.
2007-02-13 20:26:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hi
I agree with the last answer. Epson are better we have 2 epson printers and pay very little for a set of compatable inks they are widely available on the internet . Lexmark make the money on the ink cartridges that is why the machines are cheaper.
Below is a link to one web site that supply ink and delivery is free.
http://www.choicestationery.co.uk/index.html
2007-02-14 02:05:46 · answer #2 · answered by ♥shushin♥ 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I prefer hp becoz its the best among the world in Sri lanka epson is cheaper than hp..i dont know abt ur country..Sorry
2007-02-14 03:19:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i have experienced all three you have mentioned and without a doubt it has to be EPSON for me i have two of them both different models cx3600 and rx520 and it costs me £8.00 a full set of ink for each-thats not epson ink-but cheaper inks i use are ace and lasting the same as their own inks, i have found.these can be got from computer mags adds or a great site i use is www.bigpockets.co.uk
2007-02-14 01:29:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
You might also want to check out the Canon printers, which Consumer Reports rates pretty high.
2007-02-14 02:14:35 · answer #5 · answered by TitoBob 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋