I don't. She strongly supported this lie based, poorly ran, war for the past four years (after her vote).
2007-02-13
16:23:32
·
11 answers
·
asked by
True Grit
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
-- I meant anti-Iraq war types --
2007-02-13
16:26:30 ·
update #1
. Let me repeat for you - Hillary strongly supported Bush's war for four consecutive years after her vote.
She flew to Iraq last year and touted how well the war was going and we must support our troops yada yada yada...
2007-02-13
16:30:40 ·
update #2
.
Who is the goofy below with the video not answering the question?
2007-02-13
16:32:22 ·
update #3
I wouldn't exactly call her a warmonger, but I think Obama, and several other Democrats, are right when they say that there was plenty of evidence that this war was a mistake before she voted to give Bush the ok.
2007-02-13 16:28:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Crystal Blue Persuasion 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Hey I_Destroy_Liberals,
Yeah, you destroy liberals with your whole 54 points.Why do you go to bed, your probably like 15 years old. Go away douche bag
What do you mean she strongly supported this war even after she found out the truth that Bush is a lying sack of s h i t . She strongly supported the troops not the administrations for taking us to war on a bunch of lies...................The bigger question here is why in the HELL are you not holding Bush accountable for this lie based, poorly ran, war for the past four years(that was your words).
2007-02-13 16:38:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes she supports the troops but not the war. You obviously have not read a thing she has said. She also said if the truth was presented to the Senate all of those years ago she would have voted differently but THEY ALL VOTED on what was presented to them.
2007-02-13 17:20:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Gettin_by 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No--You can not blame Hillary for a lie based, poorly ran war. What is with the anti-war types? We should love war?
2007-02-13 16:36:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by GO HILLARY 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
'the front runner' status is a humorous aspect. that is prettymuch determined through 3 issues. What the get mutually hacks say optimum into the primaries. What the media kinds say durring the conventional. And, for sure, who rakes in the most marketing campaign contributions. i have not in any respect referred to it having a lot to do with the ideaology of the candidate. 'Electibility' looks a lot more beneficial major.
2016-12-04 03:56:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Were I a single-issue voter, I might agree with you. But she's still one of the best bets we have for cleaning up this mess. Not just the Iraq war, but the whole disaster of an administration we've witnessed since 2001. I think it'll quickly become less important as to who voted for or against the war, and more vital to learn who has the best strategy for resolving the conflict and also rebuilding America, as Iraq's infrastructure (and attempts to fix it) is a complete shambles.
Hillary has some good ideas re: education, health care, social services, and would certainly be a smarter ambassador for foreign affairs than The Sitcom President. That's why I'm happy to consider her worthy of my vote.
2007-02-13 16:26:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
Why do u hate wars,they create many jobs for people joining the army, im sick of hearing peole complain ao0but how their kidfs got sent to Iraq,wqell i hate to tell u this but ur kid knew whathe was getting into the day he signed up.He's maknig an honest livving,he could havw chosen a differnent occupation
2007-02-13 16:28:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
The right is much more fascinated with Hillary than Libs have ever been. She is the RNC's biggest fund raiser; they'll weep if she doesn't get the nomination.
2007-02-13 16:31:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
What are you talking about?
She supported the invasion because president Bush falsified the intelligence and LIED to us and Congress.
Blame him, not her.
2007-02-13 16:27:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
LOL, You're not supposed to ask them about THAT!
2007-02-13 16:26:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋