The recent Anna Nicole Smith fiasco got me thinking. Also, who's taking care of Britney Spears little boys while she's out partying and being carried out of clubs in the wee hours of the morning completely wasted? Why do they even have these kids if they aren't interested in carring for them themselves? Anybody else think these idiots should be sterilized?
2007-02-13 15:22:46 · 18 answers · asked by Aunt Bee 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Celebrities can afford live-in nannies,so they have plenty of help.Britney is trying to get even with her so-called husband.It's sad for the kids,they're the ones getting short-changed.These younger celebrities now want to adopt,like Angelina did.They don't even take care of their own kids,what the H*LL are they thinking?
2007-02-13 15:38:44 · answer #1 · answered by Ms Lety 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO! I'm sure that Britney has a nanny and is a good mother. As for the Anna Nicole fiasco I think it is quite a tragedy. I'm sure she was a good mother. It's my belief that her death was probably a result of depression over the loss of her son Danny. As for Ms. Smith I think every one should be respectful of her and her baby. I know she was quite the party girl but I think that the dead deserve their respect.
2007-02-13 23:31:50 · answer #2 · answered by volvo_1989_1 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's a little bit overboard, but you make a good point. I always say that it should be against the law to let celebrities get married but just think how mad the lawyers would be! lol
2007-02-13 23:28:48 · answer #3 · answered by bowl_me_over_with_love 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think celebrities are any different from any other person. It's just, unlike most people, their faults are on the news for everyone to see.
2007-02-13 23:30:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
its not all celebrities there are some good ones that take great care of there children also if you want to be technical how many regular people are having kids and raping, starving, beeting , molesting, torturing, abanding, ect. there children
2007-02-13 23:26:37 · answer #5 · answered by t_ibrahim 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. Not before we sterilize people who have kids that cannot afford them.
2007-02-13 23:33:17 · answer #6 · answered by Tony M 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think many people should be sterilized, not just celebrities (they just get the most attention).
2007-02-13 23:26:35 · answer #7 · answered by ecogeek4ever 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. They should be shot instead.
Take Anna, having a baby with her own son...thats just wrong.
Yeah, i said her son. Put two and two together.
2007-02-13 23:26:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, it should be that way that way they don't leave the spawn of Satan on for us to read about in the tabloids.
2007-02-13 23:26:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes then they can adopt kids from other countries to mess up their lives too.
2007-02-13 23:26:20 · answer #10 · answered by ICEMAN 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋