do you think he is quilifed and if so will you vote for him? if so do you think he will win the race? if not why?
2007-02-13 15:02:38 · 18 answers · asked by Que 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Well, he has more experience in an elected Federal office than the five presidents before him, combined.
Most people are using the lack of experience hoodoo as a substitute to what they really feel, that they don't want a N____R in the Whitehouse. Some of the more honest bigots are saying it out loud.
The more I see of Senator Obama, the better I like him. An I think he is starting to scare the entrenched political fat-cats.
I hope he wins.
He is right that the people who love this nation are demanding change. Not just a new cast of crooked politicians mouthing sound-bytes, plundering the treasury and sending our best young people off to die.
We need to give him all the support we can.
If the winds of change blow strong enough, every supporter, like bits of straw in a tornado, can be a lethal projectile and bring that change about.
2007-02-13 15:14:47 · answer #1 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Personally, I like Obama, but I don't believe he has the experience to be president. He has a great command of the English language and his answers to every question presented to him are dead on great. He and his wife both appear to be grounded, intelligent, and level-headed. If he had waited four more years and gained experience, he would give his opponents a serious race. I think Clinton will probably (and sadly) win the Democrats' nomination this time, but I think Obama - if nothing changes - will be a serious force in politics. I would not have voted for him because I vote a straight Republican ticket. But the way I choose to vote doesn't mean I can't respect Obama for his ideas and presentations.
2007-02-13 15:18:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
i ought to finish from what you've offered top the following, Barack Obama has a distinct variety of philosophy even as it contains how he sees u . s . a .. He would not be counted on traditionalism. He in elementary words believes in seeing his perfect of u . s . a .. the position each and every of the individuals are on a equivalent undeniable. subsequently helping his wealth distribution theory, Barack needs each and every of the' global to be on an identical taking area in container. He needs all international locations to be an identical even as it contains skill, funds, no longer one having an part over the different. subsequently he's particularly naive. and blatantly liberal. He might want to somewhat talk an armed crack broking service to lack of lifestyles than shot the bastard. Hoping that one way or the different the crack head might want to have a lucid fraction of 2d and provides you the weapon up and sing alongside got here Jones or somethig only as stupid. he's truly unrealistic, subsequently helping the elitest theory. Obama is sparkling and modern danger to this usa, desires to be voted out of place of work in 2012 or if we are fortunate adequate to question him in 2011 quicker. Barack is a real believer in the hot global ORDER.
2016-11-03 09:45:43 · answer #3 · answered by gennusa 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How many of us did background checks on PresBush if we had we may not have voted the same. Who that is promoting BO has checked out his real fathers culture. It was announced on at least two news stations he is of Muslim parenthood and not black. Why then would he be hiding this fact. Also he had a shady laundering deal with a MrRezko why? He just started frequenting 'Church' right before the last election although he sounds like he's been going forever. Check it out it was on the News.
2007-02-13 15:10:45 · answer #4 · answered by spareo1 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No I wont vote for him because he doesnt take a stand on anything. He says what he thinks the audience wants to hear. I dont think he would win. Only my opinion but I dont think he has a chance. Too many people are focused on his race, name, and upbringing ie: schooling.
2007-02-14 01:22:45 · answer #5 · answered by mnwomen 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, he is qualified in the sense that he's old enough, and he is a natural born citizen.
Right now, I doubt I will vote for him. I disagree with his approach to Iraq. But I haven't seen the ideal candidate for me yet, so there is time.
I have no idea who will win, and I don't even want to guess.
2007-02-13 15:06:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
President of Harvard Law
Constitutional Law Professor
Community Organizer
State Senator 1996-2002
US Senator 2004-2008
I dont know you tell me?
I think he's very well equipped for the job!
2007-02-13 15:31:24 · answer #7 · answered by Mrs Truth 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Many people are saying he doesn't have enough experience and isn't 'weathered' enough, but that's the reason I would vote for him. Right now, what we need isn't someone who has been corrupted politically, we need someone fresh who still holds onto his morals. I believe he has enough experience to know how to govern a country, and can certainly do a better job listening to his consituents than George Anti-christ Bush is.
2007-02-13 15:19:12 · answer #8 · answered by Jessica 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think he is quilifed or qualified. I would never vote for him. He lacks experience and he is way to Liberal. Plus he is not proposing anything new, he just strung together a lot of old Liberal speeches. I really hate Hillary, but if it were a choice between him an her, I go with her, Sen. Obama could really screw things up.
2007-02-13 15:09:49 · answer #9 · answered by Tony Z 3 · 1⤊ 5⤋
What does it take to be qualified? Running an oil company for 20 years? Is that it?
He's definately got my vote so far, he's a proven supporter of the lower and middle class. Not some rich, greedy, fatcat who's got a history of absolutely nothing, like most other options...
freeatlas...-- Yeah right.. We're not the ones who get brainwashed to believe retarded logic like that.. Thank yer buddy Hannity for that one..
2007-02-13 15:08:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋