Pres Bush has proven that iraq had WMD and saddam was invoved with al kaeda- yet libs keep trying to rewrite history and say the opposite. Do libs just hate America? Dont they want us to win?
2007-02-13 14:55:20 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Of course libs who depend of the liberal media are dumb and are fed lies and more lies- mabey thats why theyre so clueless. Thank God for Fox news- At least there people can be 'hannitized' and get no spin real truth on whats happening- and the truth is Pres Bush has couragiously gone after those who would destroy us- yet liberals have been giving aid and comfort to the enemy by trying to undermine his authority since day one. I say round up and arrest every liberal and treat them no different than the terrorists- becuse attacking pres Bush is in itself a form of terrorism
2007-02-13 15:09:43 · update #1
What matters is we win, and we win when we kill the last terrorist. The ones shooting at our troops are the terrorists.They hate us becuse they hate freedom. Kill them all, then we win.
Would you rather they attack us here?
2007-02-13 15:12:11 · update #2
The part I'm still waiting for is producing the WMDs! What has been produced so far is a few undocumented canisters of expired Sarin nerve gas. Sarin has a shelf life of 2 months.
The Al Queda connection HAS NEVER BEEN PROVEN! Saddam trying kill Zarquari before the war. The fact that Saddam's Sunnis are involved in a hated Civil War right now and have no love for Al Queda and never have must have missed you!
As a matter of fact if facts don't work on your brain at this point, nothing will!
2007-02-13 15:04:49 · answer #1 · answered by Chessmistress1000 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
what kind of crack you smoking 'patriot'
liberals hating america..trying honouring it.
Win...win what?
Win a lie?
Win more loss of life for a futile cause.
Do guys like this really read the issues?
they cant be that dumb can they?
He watches FOX all day I bet.
Otherwise its nonsense that someone would not see whats being done, and what the best action to take would be.
How many lives need to be lost?
FIRST -- why are we there?
Because Bush forgot about Bin Laden and took a turn for Saddam!! Why!!!
For WMDs that were never found!!!!
Who used false evidence!!!!
Who keeps us there under false pretenses!!!!
How can you possibly argue intelligently.
Only people that are thinking about themselves and not the betterment of the country can argue why we would stay this course.
Lies! Deciet!
How many generals has bush replaced?
Just to keep his war going?
That doesnt say anything.
But then I figure most of these people that argue are just followers.
Followers of mommy and daddy, followers of biased fox T.V., followers of the latest things they hear without researching the facts.
I bet this guy hasnt picked up a legitimate newspaper all his life.
If he has its probably just for the comics or sports.
2007-02-13 23:08:36 · answer #2 · answered by writersbIock2006 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Not finding "significant" caches of WMD's after the invasion
proves only that these weapons were moved and REMAIN UNACCOUNTED for. It is a matter of record that the USA, Britain, USSR, Germany, and France, ET AL, supplied, Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Israel, Saudi Arabia, ET AL, with all sorts of WMD goodies for the better part of the last fifty years. French Roland SAM's were found during the initial invasion in March 2003 & AFTER the UN resolutions & sanctions had clearly prohibited them. The question should be, "Where are they now?" Recall that during the first gulf war, Iraqi MIGs were flown to Iran for "safe keeping" and eventually returned to Saddam by the Iranian government.
Does anyone think just maybe the Arab proverb, "The enemy
of my enemy is my friend," has any relevance in the clash of ideologies and subsequent war on terrorism? Rest assured WMD's are in storage in caves in undisclosed locations in terrorist sponsored nations for "safe keeping," and the only blunder President Bush may have made was not acting sooner because of relentless whinning from the left when he announced plans to disarm Saddam, since the UN was incabable or unwilling to do so. Saddam had PLENTY of time to find "safe harbor" for his WMD's (i.e Syria & Iran).
2007-02-13 23:20:17 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. US of A, Baby! 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I'm starting to doubt whether your for real. Because nobody can be as stupid as you. Your just faking this, right ? You can't possibly believe this. There were no WMDs in Iraq. There is no good evidence that Saddam helped Al Queda.
2007-02-14 10:32:05 · answer #4 · answered by Count Acumen 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Really, he is right on everything. Well, I thought Iraq didn't have WMD, then he still sent troops over there because they might invent them, or something to that nature. Personally, I don't know what any side wants anymore, some say we should stay over there and fight, some say we should just come home, let them keep killing each other like they have for a million years and will keep killing each other for a million more. And, when I figure out what I would like to stand for, someone comes along and makes me stand for something I never wanted to stand for.
2007-02-13 23:02:55 · answer #5 · answered by amazon 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I disagree too many Americans are dying for nothing. I just never liked Bush in the first place. He gives off a bad Ora and my gut feeling is that he doesn't care about the lost lives and the families who are suffering. After all, Bush's parents are still alive, he has two kids and a wife. My father and grandmother died in the same week. Bush can not know what it is like to suffer that kind of pain because he has never had to deal with it personally.
You can not guarantee a win, nothing in life is guaranteed.
2007-02-13 23:39:28 · answer #6 · answered by Lynnemarie 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I sure am glad some one found something our military has not found in over 3 years, you must be a genius to have found them, however this sounds like another ploy by the Zionist to confuse every one, and while they are confused they can go undetected stealing some more secrets from America and giving them to Russia or China, and did Saddam confess to you just before he was hanged that he was friends of O,B,L, ? as you are the only one who knew this, I really think we are all some what like Amazon , read her answer,
2007-02-13 23:16:22 · answer #7 · answered by james w 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
How about posting links to the proof you speak of. We've heard these claims of proof before from neocons but never anything to substantiate it. BTW, only 32% of those polled believe Bush is doing a good job in his handling of the war in Iraq so what you're saying is that 68% of Americans hate America because they disagree with you.
2007-02-13 23:10:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Sad to say but they don't want us to win. They are doing their best to trash us and what is really sad if they were to get their way they still wouldn't be happy. The libs are so power hungry they've become blinded by their lust of it and it's one reason they hate Bush, he is everything they arent. You know if we were to be victorious in this war they will be sure to take all the credit. We just have to keep them out of power.
2007-02-13 23:03:42 · answer #9 · answered by Brianne 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Wow, I don't know where to start, I could go on for 30 minutes listing all the things Bush has failed, or lied about. But I can't answer your question I'm to busy laughing.
2007-02-13 23:14:01 · answer #10 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋