Do you actually believe ii serves to do anything but further incite our enemies to escalate their violence? It sends a message?!?! lol... what message - that the liberals in congress can talk big and make empty statements? How could you possibly think it's effective? What a load of garbage, well... congrats on your "historic" legislation.
2007-02-13 14:45:27 · 4 answers · asked by Scott B 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Though I think the Bush instigated war is ilegal, I agree that a non-binding vote is also a waste of time.
The real vote should be to impeach Bush for every violation of constitutional law he has committed.
Our job in Iraq was to destroy a regime. We have done that. The job is complete.
2007-02-13 15:43:10 · answer #1 · answered by afreshpath_admin 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
even as the properly results of the vote become not in any respect uncertain, its passage suggested a number of days of lively debate in which a small yet vocal team of lawmakers charged the determination become too vast and untimely. The determination calls for Bush to declare to Congress both previously or interior 40 8 hours after beginning protection stress action that diplomatic efforts to implement the U.N. resolutions have failed. Bush also ought to certify that action hostile to Iraq would not ward off efforts to pursue the al Qaeda terrorist community that attacked lengthy island and Washington very last twelve months. And it calls for the administration to record to Congress on the fashion of any conflict with Iraq each and every 60 days. The degree surpassed the Senate and homestead through wider margins than the 1991 determination that empowered the present president's father to pass to conflict to expel Iraq from Kuwait. That degree surpassed 250-183 in the homestead and fifty 2-40 seven in the Senate. The Bush administration and its supporters in Congress say Saddam has saved a stockpile of chemical and organic and organic guns in violation of U.N. resolutions and has persevered efforts to strengthen nuclear guns. Bush also has argued that Iraq ought to supply chemical or organic and organic guns to terrorists. Iraq has denied having guns of mass destruction and has provided to allow U.N. guns inspectors to go back for the first time in view that 1998. Deputy properly Minister Abdul Tawab Al-Mulah Huwaish called the allegations "lies" Thursday and provided to allow U.S. officials check out flowers they say are coming up nuclear, organic and organic and chemical guns. "If the american administration is fascinated in examining those internet sites, then they're welcome to come back over and function a seem for themselves," he stated. The White homestead on the on the spot rejected the availability, announcing the problem is as a lot because the United international locations, no longer Iraq.
2016-11-27 21:52:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if congress were a corporation, the CEO's would be let go for gross un-productivity. But since its a democrat majority congress, its business as usual.
we should just be thankful that the kennedys made it to the parking lot
2007-02-13 14:51:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, I don't get it. A "non-binding" resolution? What a waste of time. Think that ate into any of their 100 hours?
2007-02-13 14:56:36 · answer #4 · answered by Beachman 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋