English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is this a possible number to count?

2007-02-13 14:42:20 · 4 answers · asked by Ashley M 2 in Social Science Economics

4 answers

There's actually three classes of money.

There's physical cash - printed dollar bills and such. That's called M1. The treasury prints as much as it needs.

On the other side of the equation is M3, the theoretical limit, if everyone pulled out every resource they had. It's not technically "circulating" but it is money available.

For a classic response, ask Cecil:

Dear Cecil:

How much U.S. currency (cold cash) is in circulation around the world? Who decides how much to print? With the government continually borrowing money, shouldn't lenders be broke by now? Where do they get the money to keep lending out, especially when they know that none of it will ever be paid back? --F. Lucre, Dallas

Cecil replies:

Cheezit, Phil, you're asking me to boil two semesters of freshman econ down to 600 words. Fortunately, this is not that hard. The following pretty much covers what the well-informed citizen needs to know:

Coins and paper currency are economic petty cash. At the end of 1990 the total amount of currency in circulation was $246 billion. The total amount of money, by the strictest definition (what economists call M1), was $825 billion. M1 money is whatever you can spend right now--currency plus checking deposits. A more inclusive estimate of the money supply (M2--includes savings accounts) was $3.3 trillion.

While currency is still the most popular method of payment, it accounts for only 1 percent of the value of all transactions. (The big money travels via "wire transfer" between banks--0.1% of the transactions, but 80% of the dollars.) People sometimes say inflation occurs when the government "prints too much money." Nonsense. The amount of money actually printed is inconsequential.

Nobody is in charge of deciding how much currency to issue. The Treasury Department prints it, but the amount actually distributed to the public is purely a function of consumer demand. If people want more greenbacks, they draw down their checking accounts and get them. The government prints as much as people want.

The government doesn't create money, private banks do. Banks create money by making loans. Suppose I put $100 in my checking account. The bank bets I won't draw it out for a while and lends $85 of my $100 to legendary cartoonist Slug Signorino. Slug blows the $85 on Captain Morgan and lottery tickets at McGinty's. Now McGinty's has $85 in folding green and I've got $100 in checking that theoretically I can draw out at any time. Behold, the local money supply has bloomed from $100 to $185.

It doesn't stop there. If McGinty's puts the $85 in its checking account, its bank will lend out most of it, increasing the money supply even more. That's how the banks find the cash to lend to Uncle Sam. They lend it out, the government spends it, the recipients put the money in the bank, and the banks lend out that. The total amount of money that banks can create is regulated by the Federal Reserve. Too much money (not too much currency) = inflation.

The whole financial system is a house of cards. Probably during that last example you were thinking, jeez, what if Uncle Cecil drew out his $100, as he was legally entitled to do? It wouldn't be there! Righto. If everybody decided to take what they had coming out of their accounts and bury it in the garden, the financial system would collapse, civilization would end, and we'd all go back to being hunter-gatherers. The modern world is made possible by the trust and sheeplike predictability of millions of depositors. (Deposit insurance makes it less of a crapshoot than it once was.)

The Federal Reserve System is not part of the government and is answerable to no one. (I know you didn't ask, but lots of other people have.) By "government" I mean the executive branch. The President does appoint the Fed's governing board but the members serve for long terms and can do as they please, free of political interference (in theory). The Fed is a quasi-public agency created by Congress and as a practical matter does not lightly defy the President.

The government will never pay back the money it owes and nobody expects it to. The government borrows money by selling bonds. Each bond is a portable money machine, generating interest for its owner on a dependable schedule. Nobody wants these bonds to go away. In fact, in a time of worldwide financial instability, they are in great demand. To pay off old bonds the government simply issues new ones. The main concern is that the government not issue so many bonds that the interest payments get out of hand.

Strange business, eh? Strange as nuclear physics in its way, about as widely understood, and offering much the same attraction: the chance to yank the wires holding together the world.

--CECIL ADAMS

2007-02-13 14:54:25 · answer #1 · answered by T J 6 · 0 0

Bush fam - You are suggesting the approach is to do nothing? It's okay...your grandchildren have nothing to do but pay off your debts, so never mind. By the way, China has pegged its dollar to ours for years. Of COURSE their currency is weak. Regarding the Carter years - yes, there were problems, many stemming from the OPEC nations manipulating the oil supplies. And you know what happened? We drove 55 MPH and conserved, and they said, "erp! Maybe this won't work if we get too heavy handed," and they backed off the prices. Remember Carter was also cleaning up after Nixon's price controls fiasco, too, so cut the nonsequitors! Too bad we didn't recognized the " HMS Get OFF the friggin' Oil Teat" when that ship was docked the first time. We had the technology to build more efficient homes and non-fossil power grids back then, but then along came "The Well," and we were so busy enjoying how great life had been in the 50's that we forgot we were eventually going to wind up where we are now. I lived through Carter, and just wish he'd been more willing to tell the Republicans to stuff it and fire up his own party. No...he had to go all bipartisan on us. As for a weak dollar being good for the economy ----yup. I ALWAYS like getting less for my money. Sign me up for that deal of the month.... There may be some small advantages to making our stuff cheaper for foreign markets, asthe original question said, but long term? Give me a break

2016-03-29 05:42:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

this is not possible to answer. today the u.s. is producing and intaking trillions of dollars. the market in todays society is growing rapidly each day. the amount of money circulating around the world isn't something that one could account for, atleast not yet.

2007-02-13 15:21:22 · answer #3 · answered by shulmanandrew 1 · 0 0

not possilbe to figure out

2007-02-13 14:49:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers