2007-02-13 13:23:09 · 23 answers · asked by john m 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Neither, thank you.
2007-02-13 13:26:11 · answer #1 · answered by chole_24 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It's a tough choice.
I don't think Hillary is young enough, or tough enough, to take on the stray dogs in the neighborhood let alone the occasional bobcat that comes down from the hills.
She probably would be OK giving out dog and cat licenses, and administering rabies shots to pets.
But the position of city animal control officer is important, and we, as the electorate, should consider the qualities of these two people very carefully.
2007-02-13 21:32:21 · answer #2 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hilary clinton for sure because unlike bush clinton cares about the people not only the rich but all one day i look at this article and it said that the tuber that would put the food into the people that conldnt swallow there not gonna give any money for that and i think that borak obama would be just like bush borak obama probley keep us in that stupid war hilary can lead us out of the war plus chile has a woman for president and there doing great
so try somthing for a chnge and fell good about it so CLINTON FOR PRESEDENT say it with me CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT
COME ON VOTING FOR A WOMAN IS LIKE VOTING FOR JUSTICE CARE WELL BEING evan if u r man ill tell u this men want more power dont u finally want to stop fighting with iraq with clinton we can so VOTE FOR CLINTON!!!!!!! COME ON VOTE FOR HILARY CLINTON
2007-02-13 21:51:05 · answer #3 · answered by Juicy Princess 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Borack Obama. He seems less like a politician and more more a human being.
2007-02-13 21:37:58 · answer #4 · answered by nathan c 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would chose neither. Obama is too calm for me, too acceptable, which is not usually bad but I need someone with a clear game plan which may have to be wild and outragous. Hilary is smart, but lacks the will to get things done. I need a president that can make up their mind. She swore that she would not run, but halfway through the year she changed her mind then she changed it again. Both would be terrible.
2007-02-14 00:39:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don`t know Hilary use to work for Barry Goldwater and Borack votes for insane conservative economic trade agreements.
2007-02-13 21:28:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think what separates Obama from Hillary is his campaign centers on hope and unity, while her campaigns slogan is "I'm in it, to win it". That slogan says to me, "I will look at the polls. Figure out what I need to say. Then say it." Well... she is honest. Obama, on the hand, wants to change political discourse and bring our country together to solve problems. He looks at issues and looks for the best solution, instead of the solution that will help him win a campaign. Obama might be able to bring Democrats and Republicans together to get some work done! That is not to say he won't will seek compromises over every issue, he know when to take a stand. While Hillary was voting for the war in Iraq, Barack was speaking out against it. Here's a Barack interview from 2002: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXzmXy226po&eurl=
2007-02-14 03:26:37 · answer #7 · answered by Jake B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Female vs Black male for President... I have to go with BORACK OBAMA!!!
2007-02-13 22:23:43 · answer #8 · answered by 20 and lovin' it 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary
2007-02-13 21:32:29 · answer #9 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama for what?
President? Barack, with Hillary as the VP
2007-02-13 21:26:12 · answer #10 · answered by I doubt it 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Obama.
2007-02-13 21:26:36 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋