I'm sure if I was dreaming or not, but did Bush actually use DIPLOMACY to stop a rouge nation's/N. Korea nuke,

Question

program?

Do you think if Bush had used this strategy with Iraq (& hopefully with Iran) there may have been no need for an invasion or better yet the US would have found out that Saddam didn't have any WMDs?

Answer 1

kind of weird, right?

I don't think he had much to do with it. Six-party talks.

and socialist, well supposedly they actually tested a nuclear device, according to international news. but who knows?

Answer 2

Well the US tried diplomacy with Iraq throughout the 1990s, and even President Clinton used military action against Saddam because of the actions of Saddam in relation to weapons inspectors and non-cooperation. Further you claim that Iraq had no WMD's. Thus you either don't know what WMD's are or are ignoring the past use of them by Saddam's Iraq.

Answer 3

The question itself is loaded. We'll see what happens, but this agreement is not a guarantee of resolution. Anecdotally, I am in South Korea, most people I have spoken with are cautiously optimistic.
Some excellent responses, especially Boogity. The news we get today would have us believe that everything that everybody else does happens in a vacuum. Khatami was a moderate, but he was marginalized at home and abroad and we got, in response, Ahmadinejad. The pendulum swung, as it does in America, one way doesn't work, try another way.
The oft-cited genocide in Iraq occurred and had concluded well before our second invasion.

Answer 4

Do not fool yourself that fool has not stop north korea from nothing they still have nukes an will keep them to so you had better wake up an soon bush is a real good lier

Answer 5

I consider that philosophy in maximum circumstances- yet North Korea is an exception. the element is international kin hasn't truly worked in that experience which you have a dictatorship that exceeds, in many procedures, the whole administration and subversion of the human spirit chronicled in Orwell's 1984. besides the indisputable fact that, that does no longer advise i think of we would desire to constantly invade. at first, we've extra nukes than all of us interior the worldwide and are turning a blind eye to different turning out to be and/or unlawful classes in places like Israel, India, and Pakistan so i'm able to't shoulder the hypocrisy there. Secondly, i think of a extensive element of the North Korean inhabitants help the government even with the mass starvation, enslavement, disappearings and all, so i think of a conflict would be unwinnable. Thirdly, in the event that they did no longer procure nuclear weapons i do no longer think of they'd use them decrease than the crucial of MAD. And final- the lesson i wish maximum of have discovered via now (besides the indisputable fact that i understand many obdurate idiots refuse to yield), you may no longer in basic terms circulate and invade a rustic and bomb it and kill a gaggle of harmless people purely considering you do unlike their regulations! i think of isolation is the final answer around good now, yet we would desire to constantly sell agricultural and scientific products etc to them (the luxurious products ban became genius, i'd desire to declare). Any advancements from there would desire to come on the behest of the international community contingent upon radical reforms in Civil Liberties interior the N. Korea government. i will end via announcing that i do no longer think of the government needs to invade simply by fact, in assessment to Iraq, there are no longer any powerful commodities (ie, oil) we are able to take earnings of. besides the indisputable fact that, via no longer invading, of path, we've set a precedent that in case you haven't any longer have been given nuclear weapons (like Iraq) you would be invaded while in case you do (N. Korea) we will circulate the diplomatic path which sends a great message to each and each of the non-nuclear international places accessible. thank you to circulate Bush, ya great dumb fool.

Answer 6

When Khatami was president of Iran, he offered an even sweeter deal to end the nuclear program. Cheney's response was "We don't speak to evil".
However, Iranian presidents are tough to negotiate with because they don't have much power, and are basically figureheads.

Answer 7

Bush is feeling the pressure of the Democratic controlled Congress and Senate.

He knows he cannot use his bullying like he did to the Republican wimps when they controlled the House and Senate.

The Democrats will ask questions and demand answers.

Answer 8

Don't applaud too long. Kim Jong-IL has lied twice after getting what he wanted and it will most likely happen again.

Answer 9

No he had the idiot cards to read off of and he is a salesman so he sold them another bag of crap and they bought it?

Answer 10

Did N. korea even have nukes, or are we chasing an earthquake?