...
,,,and if you do, list three reasons why.
2007-02-13 12:28:37 · 10 answers · asked by rare2findd 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The U.S. troops are of only one use to George W. Bush - somebody has to be dying in order for him to be a War President. That's his whole pitch.
Let me make this even more clear. Check out the articles and the picture. If George W. Bush really cared about the threat to U.S. forces by Saudi militants inspired to kill Americans by Saudi leadership, why is he so cozy with them? Saudi clerics, serving at the pleasure of the Saudi royal family, are commanding Saudi citizens to travel to Iraq to kill American soldiers. Why again is Bush so concerned with Iran?
2007-02-13 12:40:31 · answer #1 · answered by Mark P 5 · 2⤊ 6⤋
while you're refering to the NIE checklist. a million: Even the UN is asserting the checklist leaves lots to be needed. 2: Even the French President says the checklist has many inconsistances that would desire to be addressed earlier we call interest over. 3: the comparable team of human beings in simple terms 2 years in the past, 2005, reported Iran became pursuing nuclear weapons and had a working enrichment application. So no he's no longer deceptive anyone. Inteligence is fical, and any checklist positioned out via a Buracreacy is subject to political push and pull, and is often suspect. anyone interior the international previous to the invasion of Iraq believed Sadam had weapons and became a threat, the disagrement became over what to do relating to the threat. anyone interior the international, alongside with the UN, believes that Iran is prusing Nuclear weapons and is a threat to the steadiness of the area. The disagrement lower back is on what to do relating to the threat, hell even france says that till Iran does a one hundred eighty they are going to decrease back a forcefull compliance with UN regulation(open conflict) Isreal laughed in our faces, out appropriate laughed. They be conscious of greater effective than anyone else interior the whole international as to the state of Irans nuclear weapons application. whilst they blow some thing up, then you definately would be conscious of negotiations have failed.
2016-12-17 09:25:13 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even if it is only a minute amount, it's more than you Arkin-loving Libtards care about the troops. What's your address? I'll send you an American flag so you can burn it.
You too are a waste of precious oxygen.
2007-02-13 13:27:27 · answer #3 · answered by Beachman 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
What angers me is we talk about how President Clinton had 13 chances to take out Osama Bin Laden and failed to do so.
President Bush has had the Terrorist Al Sadr 3 times and each time let him go. Now he is in Iran. He and his militia have been killing American Soldiers since the invasion.
I want to know why this ******* Sadr is still breathing ? I thought the reason for this war was to stop terrorism - Sadr is the next Bin Laden.
2007-02-13 12:48:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋
First , let's go to your question and have you give us 3 reasons why you insinuate he doesn't care about our troops!
2007-02-14 00:55:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The soldiers know better and 59% of them do not agree with the president's new plan, according to a survey conducted by the Army Times.
2007-02-13 13:14:59 · answer #6 · answered by Jose R 6 · 1⤊ 6⤋
Cool aid get your cool aid.see the Monkey cry real tears ,get your cool aid .the answer NO
2007-02-13 13:15:47 · answer #7 · answered by bruce j 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Bush plays the military and veterans as if they were a game of checkers.
2007-02-13 12:36:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 7⤋
I don't have to prove myself anymore. Bush is history like Hitler... waitHitler was smarter... sorry Adolf...
2007-02-13 12:39:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 6⤋
what is a "neocon" and how soon can you leave the country?
2007-02-13 12:35:57 · answer #10 · answered by patriot07 5 · 7⤊ 4⤋