The fact is, when killing paedophiles, you're not solving any kind of problem. You're just meeting out what you consider to be some wasteful kind of justice born from emotional response. Fair enough, I suppose. Yet, why, when there are other things that can be done. Why can't we use these vile miscreants. Medical science has always been hindered by the inhumanity of experimenting on people to find answers and indeed cures to the mysteries of contemporary science. I cannot help but feel that any question of ethics becomes a moot point when the subject on the operating table is a raping child killer. Who knows, perhaps this way, they'll find a cure!
2007-02-13
12:24:51
·
8 answers
·
asked by
summerland
1
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
there is no cure for it they are a waste of time. hanging em would be too quick. as a mother of two young children i hold no interest in curing these evil individuals only adequate justice for all the innocent children who have fallen prey to these monsters. i feel strongly about this and would gladly watch them suffer. the world and our children would be a safer place without them x
2007-02-13 12:38:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥♥Cat Lady♥♥ 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
all and diverse who defends a pedophile benefits to swing with him. "they're purely those who're ill," "actually everyone benefits a 2d probability," and blah, blah, frek'in blah. not in any respect ideas that they have got the worst price of recividism of any offender, or that the wear and tear they do has an tremendous ripple influence even as the victims develop up with such extremely some psychological issues that they turn to drugs or crime lots of the time. You pathetic 1/2-steppers ought to pass to an ER and interview the kinfolk and children when they have been abused or witness the useless body of a youngster whose very last moments in the international were no longer some thing yet discomfort and confusion fascinated in some souless animal's sexual gratification. You struggle through from a lack of perspective and a weak structure in case you shield their precise to stay.
2016-11-27 21:31:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
you know what i could not agree more!
only couldn`t we inject them with aids & have up to 40 years of fun experimenting with cures for it?
or find pedos with cancer & test cures on them. the first to get a successfull treatment goes free straight to the next set of painfull torturous tests for other cures.
only the thing is that 90% of pedos were treated exactly how they treat kids?
what people forget is that pedos do what they do because they know no better.
hey im all for their suffering & death!
but they have had it done.
not saying that all of them are sufferers. there are those who just have no physical or mental controll over how they feel about minors.
personally i think that the legal consenting age should be raised!
hey i lost my v before i was 12. (not sayin exactly when) with a much older girl & wish that i had not because it made my life verry complicated, i was far too young too understand & it caused me to have a shallow & bitter outlook on life.
now my mind sorted & my understanding of what relationships are all about im fine.
but pedos should get some sort of punnishment fit for taking innocence away from a defenceless child. they certainly could help others, or be givent to the parents to freely rip to shreds over what period suits them (depending on how grevious the crime) but im sure most will be in agreement no pedo should walk the streets to harm again
if it bennifits then lets do i!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~~~~~~~~~~
2007-02-13 13:33:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by muffin 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
Prisons are full of "vile miscreants".
Burglars.
Muggers.
Drug Dealers.
Fraudsters.
Rapists.
Dangerous drivers.
Some are innocent.
Justify your experimentation to the innocent ones when you have done with them, and after their innocence has been proved (sometimes many years after the event) And don't give me that DNA rubbish - any prosecuter will tell you that, on its own, it means virtually nothing.
Later:
So, Vixen, innocent animals have a greater value than innocent humans??
2007-02-13 15:23:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
YES! I totally agree. Don't let them go to waste, use them for our own education and benefit. Saves useless experimentation on innocent animals as well.
2007-02-13 22:07:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ok i see your point , but they still have to eat, sleep , drink and breath air .... to do tests on these vile creatures, they have to be fit and healthy aswell, i'd really rather they not have a life at all !!
2007-02-13 12:50:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by 株式会THE CITADEL 株式会 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who the feck is killing paedophiles? Have i missed something? There wil always be vigilantes but is it now legal to castrate the evil scumbags? Wha hey! What are you talkin about? Have i really missed something? This is the worst question i have ever seen and i love 'BRASS EYE', WELL DONE!!
2007-02-13 12:40:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by superfurrymuck 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
It sounds like a grand Idea!
2007-02-13 14:03:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 1
·
0⤊
0⤋