English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who else could have random people assisinated?
Why? To protect what pityful lives they lead, on everyone elses money? I personally think its B*****ks that "pricenes arry & bill" are in the army. how many REAL brittish people have died for this country? I'm only saying what comes from my heart, so you don't hae to read this if you don't want to.
Anyway as they say in HumanTraffic!

WHO IS THE QUEEN!!!!!!!!!!

2007-02-13 11:50:18 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Royalty

35 answers

Royalty is an outdated system that has no place in modern society. They add no value or stabilization to the current country or government, and as such are really just a waste of money.

2007-02-13 12:13:32 · answer #1 · answered by Dethruhate 5 · 2 3

Perhaps a refreshing your memory and re-reading the Magna Carta (written in Latin) or the translated version in English would aid you in answering your question.

The Monarchy is only partially responsible for any deaths of Britains aboard during war time and peace time. Those whom pass away due to defending their country should be remembered that they were in the Service of the Crown, a.k.a. Crown Service.

Though since the actions taken by Parliament which severed the MI-5 from the Crown Service, which put MI-5 directly under Parliament and OPSI, perhaps you have an issue more with Parliament’s actions than the Royal House of Windsor.

Truth be known, the Tariffs (taxes) should be used to enhance the kingdom and those whom live in the kingdom, paying on a small portion to maintain those whom govern them as a salary, the system in place provides an understanding to those whom pay these "tariffs" or "taxes" as to where each pence (or new penny if you prefer) is spent.

This at least allows those whom pay the taxes/tariffs an understanding of how their taxes are used, and hopefully the sterling is put to a use that all Britains can live with.

Is there really any difference between the family of the Royal family of Windsor, and yourself? If both of you are Britains, and both of you have served to preserve the way of life that you have, does the Title really affect you?

As for "Random Assassinations", where did you get that one from?

Can you prove that the Royal Household(s) are behind that type of incident? Also, check the Common Law to ensure that you are not performing an action that might be mis-construed as a crime by your society.

Hope this helps.

2007-02-14 07:32:22 · answer #2 · answered by Kerry. 1 · 1 0

Firstly, 'who is the Queen' is a question and therefore should have a question mark after it, it's called grammar.
Secondly, I love the royal family, look at all the countries that have had a revolution and tell me that Britain and the Commonwealth aren't just as good as them. Loads of British people have died and are willing to die for their country, and Princes William and Harry will not be treated any differently to other people in the army. Taxes go to the government and eventually find their way into various causes to help the British public e.g. NHS, we are not a corrupt country and I doubt very much that our hard earned money goes into the Queen's pocket.

2007-02-14 07:28:52 · answer #3 · answered by Taboo 2 · 2 1

This answer is not actually directed at the question but to all you ignorant childish people out there who would rather try and correct this persons grammar than accept that other people actually have opinions on the royal family and surprise surprise we don't all support them. GET OVER IT, and if you want to correct spelling and grammar then go be an English teacher and don't waste peoples time on here.

2007-02-16 10:55:26 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

This is plainly ignorance! lots of people care about the Royal family, at the Queen mothers funeral over 1 million paid respects to her - She served Britain and the Commonwealth for 66 years! Could you do that? - Doing a job you never wanted, a job which almost good as Killed the Queens father - probably not no.
the late King along with Churchill wanted to accompany the D-DAY landings in person, George VI visited troops in north africa etc.
new polls have shown 19 % favour a republic in britain and the 81 % favour the Monarchy.

2007-02-13 19:59:51 · answer #5 · answered by djgunn16 2 · 4 1

I imagine you are British. What I suggest you do is experience systems in other countries - perhaps you have and find the British system not to your liking. I care very much about the Queen and the royal family and it may come as a surprise to you that I don't begrudge her one bit of the tax that I pay towards keeping her going. Whereas i do begrudge paying for you in Broadmoor or wherever they have chosen to put you.

2007-02-15 05:12:26 · answer #6 · answered by Professor 7 · 0 0

From some of the comments some of you have made, it is quite obvious that some of you know absolutely nothing of the heritage of our great country and the part that the royal family play in that heritage. Perhaps it might be a good idea for some of you to read a bit about it, then maybe you wouldn`t make such ignorant and miss-informed statements. Don`t knock something, unless you know all there is to know about it.

2007-02-15 14:18:22 · answer #7 · answered by Social Science Lady 7 · 0 1

Having a bad day, are we?
Just for starters, who do you think the current Royal Family has had assassinated? That is a culpable accusation, and one that you can not back up because it never happened.
They do not live on everyone else's money. The royal family is paid a salary and brings in far more than that amount in tourist dollars.
Personally, I don't think you know boom all about the two princes (you might want to check your spelling while you're at it) or the royal family or anything else you are blathering about.

2007-02-13 11:59:46 · answer #8 · answered by old lady 7 · 8 1

If you understand the Queen's English,we accept the Queen as our Monarch and there are still dozen's of countries who are still aligned with the UK
You sound like a Scott who should be proud of your Regiments
Iam a proud Kiwi a direct descendant of the ANZAC's at Gallopoli In the Great War
and the 2nd NZEF in Egypt in WWII

On the day it happened I thought of a conspiracy and still remain unconvinced it wasn't
It may have ben the Greek

2007-02-13 18:43:10 · answer #9 · answered by Murray H 6 · 2 2

The prostituted entourage who clamor around and follow them around to create a phony impression that all brits approve of them has worked. Result: they keep their right hands in every brits pocket and their left hands over ever brits mouth. To speak out against them, as a result, leads to ostratization - loss of friends, people shying away from those who criticize them, loss of job promotions and relegation to loneliness, and then, emigration to the USA or some place where that royalism doesnt control minds. Everywhere you go in britain its "royal this or royal that" the queen's this and the prince of wales' that, and this has worked its way into the brits mentality so deep that they cant fathom britain functioning without it all. Diana had ideas that were incompatible with the royals power and authority - the power to cause ostracization, their great power which makes people shrink and shut up.
Anyway, when the present queen dies and charles becomes queen, maybe his conduct will cause the stuff shirted brits to wake up and think their own thoughts, not thoughts brainwashed into their antiquated minds,

2007-02-13 12:18:53 · answer #10 · answered by polldiva 3 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers