Does Obama has the faintest idea what a rushed withdrawal from Irak would do to the US chances of beating terror?
2007-02-13 10:27:09 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Obama is a typical Democrat.
He wants us to lose in Iraq.
America Loosing: That's how Democrats gain Power.
It's all about Money & Power to Democrats.
That's how commies take over countries.
2007-02-13 10:32:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Iam an Australian let me tell you Johnny Howard our PM is Bush’s mate neither have the IQ to look after their own countries let along the world that they have jointly got into such a mess and like Bush Johny boy is running very low in the esteem of the people in Australia . Bring on Kev Rudd Australia’s hope for the future.
2007-02-13 11:11:42 · answer #2 · answered by Koala 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
properly ain't that peachy. What i heard is basically the opposit. weapons Down, Gun Crime Up In Britain on the heels of a 1996 college taking photos in Britain, they enacted a number of the toughest gun regulations everywhere. British Olympic shooters won't be in a position to even prepare in Britain. whether, gun violence in Britain has persevered to enhance 3 hundred and sixty 5 days via 3 hundred and sixty 5 days. that's fantasy, whether, to think of that controls on their very own will provide up the upward push of gun crime, and the killing that outcomes. interior the aftermath of Dunblane, the passionate arguments for an all-out ban gained the day, and could be perplexing to opposite now. that's an entire and useful restrict that has meant that our Olympic shooters can prepare in trouble-free terms outdoors the country. those, like Mick North, father of one of the lifeless women, who proceed to marketing campaign against handguns, have set their face against any rest of the regulation and would p.c. to ascertain the sport of taking photos banned from the Olympics. “What do human beings in Britain p.c. — medals or homicide?” he asks. that's an comprehensible, if obsessional, reaction, whether it has little to do with the actual difficulty. The ban has had no discernible consequence on gun crime, which has persevered a soft upward push relationship back greater beneficial than 25 years and which accounted for some 4,000 injuries interior the united kingdom final 3 hundred and sixty 5 days. right this moment after the ban, the style of shootings truthfully went up and has stayed up, nonetheless the homicide fee, that's incredibly low, has been just about unaffected. In Scotland, case in point, the fee of roughly 8 killings a three hundred and sixty 5 days via weapons has remained the comparable even with the Dunblane ban.
2016-10-02 02:27:50 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well he ought to have a reasonable idea.
Us Chances of beating terror? Well in my book US intervention only created it.
Remember there were no terror links from 9/11 to Iraq. But US interests certainly cooked up the justifications albeit falsely.
Follow the outcome of the Libby facade...
2007-02-13 10:31:35 · answer #4 · answered by rumpfelt_propaganda 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
All little Johnny Howard did was shoot him self in the foot - again! Been doing that a fair bit lately.
Howard is only "W"s poodle and should be muzzled!
2007-02-13 10:58:55 · answer #5 · answered by mad_mick001 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm Australian and i can't wait for Howard to be beaten at the next election,Bushes little bum buddy,that's all he is
2007-02-13 10:52:59 · answer #6 · answered by TOM 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Howard got schooled by Obama LOL!!
Why don't you send 20,000 troops too if you agree with the war so much!!
LOL!!
Howard will be beat at the next election thanks to Obama.
LOL!!
2007-02-13 11:06:44 · answer #7 · answered by jswnwv 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Australia is so pro-war then why don't they contribute more than 2,000 troops?
Only delusional people think that we are still able to halt terrorism altogether. Get over yourself.
2007-02-13 10:33:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Unfortunately I must agree with Prime Minister Howard. A vote for OBAMA is a vote for OSAMA.
2007-02-13 10:32:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
what? who cares about australia! and where the hell is irak?
2007-02-13 10:30:15 · answer #10 · answered by michelle112785 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋