2007-02-13 10:15:36 · 22 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes
2007-02-13 10:20:19 · answer #1 · answered by Laura H 1 · 5⤊ 0⤋
peace did not work with North Korea. North Korea blackmailed the rest of the world into being given aid and still made everyone think that this was an end to their Nuclear intentions.
It is not, they will make the same threats again in the near future and there won't ever be peace.
George Bush thankfully hasn't the balls to invade Iran or drop the bomb - if he did, he wouldn't have waited until now, but would have wiped out the middle east already.
Peace in Iraq is now impossible without the country being split up like the old Soviet Union, due to the civil war (yes - that's really whats happening over there!).
US and British soldiers should leave the country asap and let the Spineless U.N. try their luck.
2007-02-13 18:52:35 · answer #2 · answered by The Unknown Soldier 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt if we are ever going to have peace with N. Korea. The UN (mostly US troops) has been in South Korea for over fifty years protecting against the North.
Even though we may have an understanding with them, Kim IL Jung and his father before him would do just about anything to unify the peninsula. That includes an all out attack to claim the southern half of Korea. Just ask any US military personnel that have been there. The country is prime for battle every where you go north of Seoul.
As for peace with Iran and Iraq, that would be an excellent idea. Do you think Iraq could survive a civil war that will eventually turn into genocide? As far as Iran goes, they are just another country with an unreasonable leader who is merely a figurehead. It's really up to the Cleric leadership to decide which direction they go, but it's clear that Ahmajinedad is not the person to lead them to peace.
2007-02-13 18:30:55 · answer #3 · answered by ggraves1724 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The thing about Iraq is understanding political perception. The only reason that bush lied to us to get into iraq is on account of the oil and nothing else, there is a whole lot of mega bucks in that oil in iraq, and iran is next, once the president gets his hands on iran? Its just another peice of the puzzle of taking over the middle east. There is a lot more, but I'll spare you because it is too time consuming to put the cards on the table, but believe me on this, that thing going on in iraq isn't going to go away soon.
2007-02-13 18:30:06 · answer #4 · answered by Pink Honey 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Don't count of the peace lasting in North Korea. Remember, President Clinton tried it with them, gave them lots of "perks" not to develop nuclear weapons....we now see how far that went.
As the great President Reagan once said, "Trust, but verify"
2007-02-13 19:12:57 · answer #5 · answered by jonn449 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iran maybe, since we already invaded Iraq, don't you think it is a bit late to worry about peace?
2007-02-13 18:21:28 · answer #6 · answered by zombiefighter1988 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
As long as Iraq and Iran still have oil reserves, you can forget about peace.
2007-02-13 18:23:39 · answer #7 · answered by Hemingway 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
PEACE is the only real answer --It's sad no one thinks that way anymore--But I haven't heard of anything good from N.Korea recently-Do you have a link I may see??
2007-02-13 18:24:39 · answer #8 · answered by Art 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, its not peace it"s delayed conflict.If you think that we have heard the last of N. Korea , well than I'm telling you that Hillary will be president.Since we all know that will not happen there is your answer.
2007-02-13 18:24:06 · answer #9 · answered by shawnn 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
you are sadly mistaken if you think "peace has now worked with north korea".
2007-02-13 18:43:56 · answer #10 · answered by patriot07 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋