English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've never heard of such a thing. In all of the cases that I have ever heard about from friends and so forth, when an unwed female gets pregnant and has a baby, any of the guys who might come in question as the possible father are booking flights for Mexico City and otherwise heading for the tall grass.

Why, in this case, are so many guys, and even Zsa Zsa Gabor's boyfriend (or whatever), falling all over themselves declaring that they are the baby's father? Am I missing something? Or, as Jay Leno says, "What is wrong with this picture.?"

Thanks, Henrietta

2007-02-13 09:25:19 · 22 answers · asked by Henrietta 2 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

This is being added after 21 responses: There has been some talk on Court TV that the lawyer who has been her constant companion, Howard K. Stern, was present when everybody died. He was there when her 90-year-old husband died, when her son died, and, now, when Anna Nicole died. Is it possible that these were all homicides? Yikes!

2007-02-13 10:24:59 · update #1

22 answers

the kid is worth 488 milliion dollars thats why.

i wouldn't trust court tv as an honest source. they are known for making stuff up and actually a few of their "reporters" have law suits against them for false info. oh of course court tv ain't telling you that. i believe nancy grace has a law suit on her as we speak.

also i think its kind of unfair to always blame that guy howard. first off intodays media world...things often aren't told with truth. because someone called the police doesn't mean they were there. howard could have walked in on the whole thing. and from my knowledge howards wasn't there when the old guy died BECAUSE ANA DIDN'T EVEN HAVE HIM AS A LAYWER THEN SHE WAS USING THE OLD MANS LAYWERS. they two are suing for a piece of the old mans money.

remember court tv once had gloria allred force her way into being amber frys lawyer (even she says fry asked her to be aher lawyer-but later contridicted those statements)...she got inside info on the peterson case and gave it to her friends at court tv (isn't nancy grace her DAUGHTER?)-then when the law asked who was leaking info (and it was obvious it was...GLORIA) she denied it....

gee i wonder who was leaking info to COURT TV...gee i wonder who. court tv is the last place i'd be looking for HONEST news.

2007-02-13 09:33:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Anna Nicole Smith's fortune is now in the hands of her baby girl.
Whoever the father really is, he is in charge of that fortune until the baby is of legal age to control it themselves. Her death would have been far less complicated if her son were still alive, as he would probably become legal guardian of the child (though not the father of course) in her best interests, and would control the entire fortune, wisely as I would assume. I feel sorry for the baby girl.. so many people fighting over her.. she's lost her mother.. and no matter how much money she has inherited, she'll have learnt that money can't buy everything (when she's old enough.. and i'm referring to the fact that it can't buy her mother back).

2007-02-13 09:41:55 · answer #2 · answered by Clarke 1 · 0 0

Anna Nicole Smith has millions of dollars coming her way from her late husband's death. The money she inherited is held for her. So, since she is dead, the baby will get the money. The baby is too young to hold onto it, so the father will soley be responsible for it. I personally think she and her son were murdered by the father so they could not get the money, and therefore it's accessible to him. They also could be doing it for their 15 minutes of fame, but I think it's having to deal with money.

2007-02-13 09:31:20 · answer #3 · answered by *~*~*~* 4 · 1 0

Because the baby is potentially worth $450 million dollars.

2007-02-13 09:32:19 · answer #4 · answered by heybeerman29 2 · 0 0

Her dead husbands money !!!! If the 88 million is awarded to her estate it all goes to Danielynn. She will be a very wealth baby. Whoever has guardianhip of her has control of the money.

2007-02-13 09:28:42 · answer #5 · answered by K M 4 · 0 0

of course, she no longer in trouble-free terms did no longer use any start administration, she did no longer use condoms the two..uggggg. Did you study that they are doing DNA to ascertain if the infant is HERS???? How does that ensue. unfavorable infant. that's who I care approximately. so a strategies, there is not any longer one among those fellows who acted like the DAD in the previous she grew to become into killed, different than the smarty arty criminal expert who knew to muddy the water as much as attainable. i think of that's a huge conceal up via fact her son grew to become into murdered in well-being facility and he or she found out, and so she too grew to become into taken out. that's the main clever. Ask Monk or Matlock if it is too lots of a twist of fate that the two she and her in trouble-free terms male inheritor die interior the span of 5 months???????? homicide! that's what that's.

2016-10-02 02:22:14 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Many people what to claim this baby as their own because it comes with a 22.2 million dollar check. Good enough?

2007-02-13 09:36:56 · answer #7 · answered by SadSnyder 2 · 0 0

The baby could potentially be worth freaking millions!

2007-02-13 09:29:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

She's going to be a VERY Rich little girl and someone needs to have control of her money until she is of age

2007-02-13 09:31:10 · answer #9 · answered by Girl1370 2 · 0 0

probably because all the shallow blokes out there see the 120 million quid bonus with the baby, or however much it is

2007-02-13 09:35:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers