I no it is mcnabbb but i wanna see what other people think
2007-02-13 09:23:45 · 22 answers · asked by man 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Well...Vick is a better all around athlete...but as far as QB skills, I would never lean in favor of Vick on that one. He's fun to watch, sure, definately, but I want to see how well he can do as a pocket passer more often.
McNabb until then....he's probably a top 5 QB in the league with Manning, Brady, Brees, and Palmer...if you ask me...others probably have their own little lists.
2007-02-13 09:28:27 · answer #1 · answered by Carolina Kitten 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yeah no doubt McNabb. Vick hasn't lived up to the expectations of being the next level quarterback. Donovan has giving some production with going to the Superbowl. Another goog question is how is Vince Young going to compare to these guys 5-10 years from now?
2007-02-13 17:31:49 · answer #2 · answered by Deep In The Woods 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Donovan McNabb is the better of the two. Vick I believe would make a better running back than QB.
2007-02-13 17:29:15 · answer #3 · answered by Zoe 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Donovan McNabb is better than Michael Vick, and he's only widening that gap. McNabb is getting smarter and becoming a better player while Vick seemingly is getting dumber and regressing into even more run-run-run.
2007-02-13 18:13:23 · answer #4 · answered by will4144 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This has got to be the dumbest question I've ever seen!! Let me ask you some questions!! Has Vick ever thrown for more than 3,000 yards? Has he ever thrown for more than 20 TD's? If so how many times? Mcnabb is a better passer and not far behind him in running. Mcnabb is pass first run if you have to. Vick is run first pass if you have to.....maybe. I dont like either to tell the truth. Garcia!!!!!
2007-02-13 23:51:50 · answer #5 · answered by Deadboy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
McNabb without a doubt. Vick is one of the most over rated players in the league. Great athlete but a poor QB.
2007-02-13 18:33:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You couldn't ever convince me that Vick is better. He hasn't done anything up to this point in his career besides the 1,000 yards rushing and over 1,000 passing yards this past season. He has no team accolades other than beating the Packers in Lambeau (when that was still difficult). McNabb has led the team to 4 NFC Championship games and a Super Bowl. He is also a possible Hall of Fame candidate (if he doesn't continue this injury prone-ness next year).
2007-02-15 10:41:59 · answer #7 · answered by RichMac82 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
while i agree that it's McNabb, many of ya'll are very off on Vick. his passing stats have suffered much due to young recievers that drop alot of balls. while McNabb's wr are no-names, Vick's have become failed projects. they've drafted and signed wrs with plenty of potential yet it hasn't paid off. maybe he throws too hard a ball for them, but to think that his passing stats mean he should be a running back is making a biased opinion. anyone who's ever seriously watched Vick would understand he is more than capable to be a qb. he's took a team to the NFC championship and been to pro bowls. those things weren't flukes...
all that said i would take McNabb. better game all around...
2007-02-13 19:16:27 · answer #8 · answered by sseleman10 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mcnabb can throw the ball and is pretty good at running and Vick can't throw but can run. i think mcnabb is the better quarterback but Vick is the better running back.
2007-02-13 17:29:17 · answer #9 · answered by mizzoucj 1 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Hands down, Donovan McNabb! He's gotten better and better every year. I had him on my Yahoo fantasy team and he killed all the competion every week until he was hurt. He's one of the top tier quarterbacks and assuming he comes back healthy, should do even better in '07.
2007-02-13 19:01:07 · answer #10 · answered by Owlchemy_ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋