English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Well everyone is making a big fuss out of a Sen. Hillary Clinton being a woman but most importantly making a big fuss out of Sen. Barack Obama being black, questioning his christain religion, and calling 10 years as a senators ( State/US) inexperienced. What do Republicans have to offer?

Rudy Guliani- He lacks of experience, has only been a City Mayor nobody's asking him to be a US Senator ot Governor first. He is also Pro-Choice, meaning he supports abortions. So do you Republicans really agree with that?

Romney is a mormon. So guys are usually pretty serious about Christianity, why dont you fuss about that. Atleast we know that Obama and Hillary are really Christians!

McCain is your last hope but I don't know how well he'd be able to run against the progressive Democrats when half of America wants a change. At 70 years of age, McCain represents an older generation of politics.

2007-02-13 08:55:20 · 14 answers · asked by Mrs Truth 2 in Politics & Government Elections

I am not trying to persuade votes I am just trying to show you all that the same irrelevant biasa toward Democratic nominee are the same flaws of your party candidates.

Can we please start voting based on their stance on issues and leadership skills...not race, gender, religion, or so called "inexperience"

2007-02-13 08:57:45 · update #1

14 answers

It is so refreshing to see someone with an open mind... who is independent enough to consider the actuality's of election diversity's,
If it's an answer you expect from me, you will not get it...i havent heard all i' 'need' to reach a decision yet, nor will i ...until i see if this election is going to become a pissing contest between who is the most accomplished badmouther, or what-ever.
I would like to see two mature candidates in the final running, acknowledging each other as equals, with different views, ability's and capability's not attacked, but acknowledged, respected, and the public left to determin which of them we consider to be the most qualified for the office, as an individual.

2007-02-13 10:56:15 · answer #1 · answered by olddogwatchin 5 · 1 0

Rudy Giuliani lacks of experience? He was the mayor of New York City. He brought the city out of a financial mess. He was there on 9-11-01 how so you forget. Being a governor does not make you qualified to be a President, take Jimmy Carter for instance he was a Governor and the worst President in the last 100 years. Do you even know what the Mormons believe? Hillary a christian because she wears a cross around her neck?

2007-02-13 09:27:59 · answer #2 · answered by Clyde N 1 · 0 1

Mrs. Truth, (I'm sure we are not related), so far I am behind a guy named Tom Tancredo. He has an exploratory committee and might be in the running for either Republican or Independent. He's been flying under the radar, but I've been to his webiste and listened to him on npr. He has a great speaking voice and is strong on issues and ideas. He is openly opposed to Bush's Illegal Immigration and No CHild Left Behind Act. i think he would be great and I hope he makes a strong showing in the months to come.

I don't like any of the other Republicans or Democrats.

2007-02-13 09:57:32 · answer #3 · answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 · 0 0

Runner9 says "would you want someone running this country with hardly any experience in the politics?" Obama has as much as either Kennedy or Lincoln and a Harvard law degree to boot, at least he understands the constitution unlike the current occupant

2007-02-13 10:52:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

a million. now and back human beings vote journey over regulations. it is not any longer in trouble-free terms the coverage that concerns, it is the abilty to ascertain that those regulations are enacted. 2. that's a single difficulty - and maximum voters evaluate many matters in choosing a candidate. 3. The RNC did no longer do the comparable, they penalized via 50% on the beginning up. and that they did no longer plan revotes yet then enable one marketing campaign to dam them, interior the face of inevitable losses. counseled voters evaluate many aspects in making a call. coverage, character and shown skill would all be on the checklist for any voter, and each and each voter would priorize their standards in yet in a diverse way.

2016-10-02 02:20:41 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I'm voting for Barack Obama not because he's black, but because he is an honest man. He admitted to using drugs as a teen, and he is a real person. He is for the death penalty, abortion rights, and civil unions (not gay marriage). So I don't believe Barack is as liberal as they say he is. Vote Barack Obama!

2007-02-13 09:17:44 · answer #6 · answered by Harry D 2 · 3 0

The right-wing Christian churches want a government to tell women what to do with their bodies and tell others that they are not allowed to marry the gender that they fell in love. America is not a Christian country and it is unfortunate that some want to force their religion down other people's throats. They want to do this by the possession of firearms and bulk at any restriction on gun control. "I have a gun. Vote Republican or I will shoot you." They want to have guns, because they are paranoid of the world. That is why they support war. They are frightened of other nations and of their next door neighbors. They believe in living under the two "fs," which is fear and force. I must attack other countries and my neighbors before they attack me. I will force my will upon them. I will force them to adopt my religion and force their children to say, "one nation under God," even if their children are atheists.

2007-02-13 09:11:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I'm a Dem and I don't support Hillary because she's a moron. Her being a woman has nothing to do with it. As for Obama, I don't know enough about him. I'd like to hear what all candidates (besides crazy Hillary) have to say before I decide who I'm supporting.

And, if the repubs want to put a pro-choice man in the white house, why on earth would you want to stop them???

2007-02-13 09:03:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

You forgot to mention Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo.

note:
REAL republicans would love a Barak Hussein Obama nomination, his name alone epitomizes everythingt the Democratic party stands for and believes. We dont even have to describe his inexperience, opportunistic attendance at a Christian church, shady business deals, or Islamic background.

2007-02-13 10:01:52 · answer #9 · answered by jongcr 1 · 0 3

That kool-aide taunt is never used correctly, which is almost ironic. Yeah, calling a decade of service "inexperienced" seems like a bit of a misnomer.

2007-02-13 09:06:10 · answer #10 · answered by The Ry-Guy 5 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers