After the Bush regime is over, will Reds finally realize that the "Lewinsky" ordeal wasn't that bad?

Question

Over three thousand soldiers dead, or a some Intern head?.... You make the call....

Answer 1

If they get sick of hearing about Bush's mistakes, remind of other Republicans who had some "sex" problems too.
http://www.armchairsubversive.com/

Answer 2

Who are Reds? If you mean the people in the red states, I don't see how you can judge a whole state by some arbitrary news report showing how the votes went down in a particular state.

That being said, the whole Monica Lewinsky affair was a tawdry black mark on the office of the Presidency. While that had nothing to do with President Bush, we are all paying the price in our country and elsewhere for the shameful behavior of President Clinton. If you don't think that has anything to do with the decline in the image of the USA, you are mistaken. In fact, I will go so far as to say it contributed greatly to the attacks of 9-11.

Answer 3

I realize that over 3000 Americans were killed on 9/11 largely due to Clinton's incompetence. He was too busy with Lewinsky and the like to care about terrorism. Not only the 3,000 on 9/11, but what about he USS Cole? What about the US Embassy bombings, etc...More died due to Clinton and Lewinsky. At least Bush isn't afraid to fight the radical Islamists. Or maybe it's that he actually cares and Clinton didn't.

Answer 4

Monica Lewinsky sucks!

Answer 5

Over 3 thousand innocent American people dead due to radical muslims in one day, who buy the way bombed over 20 places under Clinton's administration and he did NOTHING! So while he was lying under oath trying to cover up this innocent "Lewinsky" ordeal, what exactly was he doing again????

Answer 6

Ok

You win. No more sending our troops to quell a sectarian civil war for oil.

So now you are going to promise not to push for troops to go to Darfur. Because after all, Darfur is a sectarian civil war for oil.

http://money.cnn.com/2007/01/29/news/companies/pluggedin_gunther_sudan.fortune/index.htm

http://money.cnn.com/2006/02/08/news/international/africa_fortune/index.htm


I'm not quite sure what Bush lied under oath about. After all, Saddam used WMD 15 times. And Clinton wanted to go to war with Iraq in 1998.


- Haij Umran Mustard August 1983 fewer than 100 Iranian/Kurdish

- Panjwin Mustard October-November 1983 3,000 Iranian/Kurdish

- Majnoon Island Mustard February-March 1984 2,500 Iranians

- al-Basrah Tabun March 1984 50-100 Iranians

- Hawizah Marsh Mustard & Tabun March 1985 3,000 Iranians

- al-Faw Mustard & Tabun February 1986 8,000 to 10,000 Iranians

- Um ar-Rasas Mustard December 1986 1,000s Iranians

- al-Basrah Mustard & Tabun April 1987 5,000 Iranians

- Sumar/Mehran Mustard & nerve agent October 1987 3,000 Iranians

- Halabjah Mustard & nerve agent March 1988 7,000s Kurdish/Iranian

- al-Faw Mustard & nerve agent April 1988 1,000s Iranians

- Fish Lake Mustard & nerve agent May 1988 100s or 1,000s Iranians

- Majnoon Islands Mustard & nerve agent June 1988 100s or 1,000s Iranians

- South-central border Mustard & nerve agent July 1988 100s or 1,000s Iranians

- an-Najaf -Karbala area Nerve agent & CS March 1991 Shi’a casualties not known

Answer 7

Oh, the people who got all worked up about Lewinsky will *never* let it rest. That was about SEX! (And yes, perjury, I *know* -- over a topic that was nobody's business, and he was fined *and* impeached for it).

Answer 8

But what else would they have? They can't. Maybe they'll just go to get banged by Catholic priests, or molest a little boy or two, shoot someone in the face with a shotgun... you know, the usual republican morality acts.