English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

an islamic militant living in a cave in afganistan defied the multi billion dollar US military and intelligence establishment.Whos a conspiracy nut????

2007-02-13 07:31:00 · 16 answers · asked by Frank 1 in News & Events Current Events

16 answers

Who killed JFK?

2007-02-13 07:33:45 · answer #1 · answered by GoodWillHunt 3 · 2 0

I am not gullible but I do look at all the FACTS of the case.
I have yet to see anything when quotes are taken into context and check against independent sources that do all point back to bin laden.

To answer you last question you are the consiparcy nut to believe that 9/11 didn't happen the way all the facts and evidence agree on.

Name me 1 thing just 1 that proves 100% that 9/11 wasn't done by bin laden. This must be willing to stand up in court.

Do you have such evidence I like to see it.

2007-02-13 07:38:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Whats harder to believe? That a group of terrorists succeeded in a plot because our ''intelligence'' agencies weren't sharing information? or that our government conspired, without a single leak from all the people it would have taken to put together and implement that plan, and blew up the towers and the pentagon? I admit, they are both really hard to believe. But a friend of mines father spent his life working for the NSA has a hard time believing that in a government where everyone else is out to burn their best friend for more political success, theres no way that secret could have been kept. I don't believe it either personally. Too many careers would have been made by selling everybody else out. Not to mention the skilled people who would have had to wire the buildings, create fake phone conversations, steer the planes by remote into the buildings. It paints a very unpatriotic picture of the average working american, which almost anybody will tell you, just isn't the case.
One more thing. You're lying to yourself if you deny the hatred many people have for our country and the west in general. We've (the west) been running around the world oppressing and drawing political borders for hundreds of years. Some people rightfully hate us and everything we do. Read ''the looming towers'' by Lawrence Wright. He does a good job of detailing the history of radical Islamist terrorist groups, Al Qaeda, and the build up to their attack on 9/11.
Good luck.

2007-02-13 07:51:17 · answer #3 · answered by Hans B 5 · 2 0

No more so than those who see a conspiracy everywhere they look should be.

I do not think the islamic militant was living in a cave when the planning for 9/11 was taking place was he?

2007-02-13 07:57:58 · answer #4 · answered by 63vette 7 · 1 0

You mischaracterize the official story. It's not "an Islamic militant living in a cave." It was a state-funded, sponsored and harbored, widespread and wide-ranging international nongovernmental organization, highly organized and highly motivated, and highly intelligent, with significant resources, that had a base and training facilities in Afghanistan. Bin Laden did not go to a cave until after the U.S. started the Afghan phase of the war.

Further, it has always been the case that a highly motivated person, willing to die in the effort, can cause quite a bit of damage. In the grand scheme of things, we Americans exaggerate the size of 9/11/01. It was big for us, since we've never lost so many people on the U.S. soil in one event. But, in reality it was two buildings downed and one damaged, three planes, and 3,000 people. The next event that will occur as a result of the highly motivated organization(s) that are out there will be of far greater magnitude.

Poo poo it if you like. I only WISH our "military and intelligence establishment" was as invulnerable as you imply. I'd feel a lot better about the next couple of decades if we really were that powerful. The sad fact is, we are not.

2007-02-13 07:39:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

it is a complicated question. Gullibility isn't unavoidably dumb or stupid. Gullibility can upward push up at the same time as someone is flattered through some different person who don't have the first individual's maximum ideal interests in suggestions. So then, an in the different case smart individual is frequently a gullible individual at the same time as it is composed of love, flattery, conceitedness, or a want for validation. I consider others about upbringing, yet i imagine elements of upbringing are also shown in a chart. I also agree about Neptune, yet Venus would also communicate. i'm a guy, and that i can allow you to understand that typically a highly face and body makes me forget what the again of my suggestions is declaring about the guy's genuineness. If I were youthful and very attracted to the female in that image, it would no longer take position to me to ask your self no matter if she grow to be for authentic, or a stolen image. My son grow to be courted on line through a lady in California for dissimilar months. She fairly had him worked up, and despatched him dissimilar pictures. Our kinfolk isn't into celebrities a lot, so it took us a at the same time as to comprehend that the images were Carrie Underwood. for sure, it wasn't Carrie, and the female grow to be utilising the call Jessie. Who knows, it would were some center age guy hitting on youthful boys. Edit @ Isabelle - properly, how would you experience if it grow to be your image stolen? the guy in that image isn't a celeb.

2016-12-04 03:29:27 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It's just crazy typical conspiracy theory. But thing is that free speech cover such wide range of things that in the country you can sell books that claim 'natural cure for everything' and you'll be protected by first amendment. 911 conspiracy is full of misleading claims and many cases, outright lies, but sadly these people are also protected by first amendment. Unless they go kill someone you can't do a thing to them.

2007-02-13 09:56:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

And again a nut case treads on the graves of the victims. You are so busy trying to score political points you never consider those who lost family and friends. You should be ashamed. Of course, you won't be, you are too busy scoring points to actually care about those who suffered or even the facts. Where are there any hard facts, facts that have not been refuted repeatedly? But of course, you will never accept the truth as it is very inconvenient, it disagrees with your preconceived notions.

2007-02-13 07:55:01 · answer #8 · answered by Elizabeth Howard 6 · 1 2

You have a point here.
Do not exclude this:
A small army can do more damage when ,that army, fight against
a large ineffective one.

I don't think that one or more high U.S. officials knew this would happen one day and didn't do anything.

2007-02-13 07:51:11 · answer #9 · answered by Machiavelli 2 · 0 0

Is there such a thing as an "official" conspiracy?

2007-02-13 07:51:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

That remark is soo uncalled for, and in my opinion, just another attempt to insult the mental capacity of anyone other than those who know or appear to know as you have presented your wits.

2007-02-13 07:49:08 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers