what have they done for America?? tell me please....
2007-02-13
06:57:36
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Quickie
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
If I can only vote for a Democrat, I would pick Governor Richardson at least he has more experience than those 3.
2007-02-13
07:00:42 ·
update #1
and to Rick. you must be a Kerry supporter, am I right?
so did you check your 401K lately? I think not.
2007-02-13
07:02:33 ·
update #2
I see lots of Kerry supporters here so how was that "Anyone but Bush" working out for you in 2004?? LOL
2007-02-13
07:04:06 ·
update #3
good attempt at a good question.
to those saying to make up your own mind, you got the idea right, but we moderates whant to know what reasons you might see for supporting them (we are looking for more info... finding those slamming hillary is easy.)
for those giving the anti-bush rhetoric.... you should know that you sound like idiots.... primarilly because bush won't be running again.... so you are wasting a real opportunity to get your opinion out there by just hating bush. you want to play the "because it's better than bush" argument again, at least start throwing giuliani's name in there o something.
2007-02-13 07:22:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by foo__dd 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am pulling up the chair next to chumpchange. . .
I am not going to exert any effort to get you to do something you never have any intention of doing. I know I will vote for the candidate that represents my ideals the best. Sometimes experience isn't everything. If it were, then Bush would have done a hell of a lot better, right????
2007-02-13 07:18:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Edwards. He aims to freshen up the well being care marketplace, somewhat of allowing it to develop into exported as is now the case. He also aims to make the u . s . a . thoroughly skill self sustaining, and acknowledges that corn ethanol is a cyber web skill loser. different resources are more desirable sensible, and do not have a historic previous of causing leukemia or maximum cancers, like petrofuels and nuclear skill. even as i have self assurance he will draw down the troops in the middle east, i imagine actuality trumps wish or rhetoric, and the u . s . a . will proceed to have a presence in Iraq and the middle east, inspite of if a a lot less confrontational. with reference to well being care and ability, I easily have leukemia because i replaced into raised in the oilpatch and recognize very a lot about the topic matters of the U. S. medical gadget, and see the more desirable sensible consequences in Canada and northern Europe.
2016-11-03 08:52:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
How about Joe Biden? He's got more experience than all those candidates you mention combined! 30 years worth, in all areas, but esp. in the area of Foreign Relations (as chair of the Foreign Relations Committee). He's also co-sponsored a lot of legislation with Republicans as well; he works well with others! I think it would be nice to have a diplomatic president; actually would be very good for our country!
2007-02-13 10:11:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Karen 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
its not up to liberals or democrats to talk to you into voting for any of the 3 mentioned.......its up to yourself to look at each candidate objectively and see which one is the most promising.......however i personally would vote for the one who has not been influenced or corrupted by special interests groups and so far that would be Obama.......however you are right in terms of experience Richardson wipes the floor with the other 3 you mentioned....objectivity is the key.
2007-02-13 07:14:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by fox mulder 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Here's what I'm doing, and you might want to do the same. I am reading and listening very carefully to every candidate, and then I will make up my mind. In my personal opinion, it's way too early to choose. The one who convinces me they will do the best job for the country will get my vote.
2007-02-13 07:07:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Did you vote for Bush?
Here is the answer to your question:
Look what Bush has done <> America.
Frankly I don't care if Justin Timberlake is our next president, this can't get any worse.
EDIT:
Not a Kerry supporter although he was better than the alternative in '04. So you don't agree?
You really would vote for Bush if he ran again? Is it the horrible immigration policy, the monstrous deficits, the intrusive domestic spying, the continuous war, which one of Bush's qualities make him attractive to you?
Next to all that a tax cut doesn't seem terribly important does it.
Bring on the flames :)
EDIT 2:
"Anybody but Bush" would have been less bad yes, your point?
2007-02-13 07:01:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rick 4
·
7⤊
4⤋
They haven't screwed up everything they've touched. lol.
But seriously. Pelosi was key in the 100-hour plan which I think was great. She is also being very tough in wanting results and plans for Iraq. I also agree with her stances on civil liberties, education, environment, and healthcare. I also agree with many of the things Obama is for. And I really like a lot of the legislation he has been part of. I also like Edwards' views with healthcare, poverty, environment, and Iraq.
2007-02-13 07:07:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Take it from Toby 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Vote for the best candidate, regardless of party. The candidate that represents the american people!
Ron paul 2008
2007-02-13 07:01:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
I'm voting for BARACK OBAMA not because he's black, but because he is an honest man. He admitted to using drugs as a teen, and he is a real person. He is for the death penalty, abortion rights, and civil unions(not gay marriage). So I don't believe Barack is as liberal as they say he is. Vote Barack Obama!
2007-02-13 09:22:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Harry D 2
·
1⤊
1⤋