English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i like him but its about time dat he loses da title. wat do u think?

2007-02-13 06:39:04 · 22 answers · asked by Eli 2 in Sports Wrestling

22 answers

i think he has had it for to long and he should lose it at wrestlemania to HBK.

2007-02-13 06:45:29 · answer #1 · answered by timothy 5 · 0 0

With or without the belt, I'll still be a Cena fan because of his great vocal ability (much like The Rock has).

I wouldn't be surprised if Edge and/or Randy Orton pulls some strings with Coach to get a title match before WrestleMania, defeats Cena, and defends the belt against HBK (and perhaps Cena in a Triple Threat... or even a Fatal 4-Way featuring all four of them).

2007-02-13 15:27:55 · answer #2 · answered by Judge Ghis 6 · 0 0

Worst champion since Yokozuna (R.I.P). Boring, no in-ring skills. Seems like a genuinely nice guy though. Who would he lose the title to? HBK is on the downswing of his career, he's already had a long program w/HHH, Undertaker only works part-time. Edge again? Blah. Orton? Terrible wrestler. His title run was a disaster. Who else is there? I'd love to see Ric Flair as champ one more time, but there is NO way that's gonna happen.

2007-02-13 14:46:21 · answer #3 · answered by Jason D 3 · 0 0

I mean don't get me wrong, I love Cena and respect what Michaels has done, but after a while Cena should've been dropped the title. It would be nice to see him go for the IC title or somethin' like that but being such a high card, he probably never will.

2007-02-13 14:48:01 · answer #4 · answered by starry- eyed 4 · 0 0

All bias aside, a face is better off chasing after the title as an underdog. I like when people hold a belt for a long time though, regardless to who it is (or what they do to it) it gives the belt prestige, and it gives the holder credibility as a champion. Now, one could argue all prestige is immediately killed by the spinner, and I'd agree, but that doesn't negate the fact that people SHOULD hold on to a title for a long time. Back in the day, people held onto titles for years, but then again, back then people could wrestle worth a lick, unlike all three champions on all three WWE brands...

2007-02-13 14:44:57 · answer #5 · answered by Candle 7 · 0 1

I agree. Lengthy title reigns tend to make the show predicable and boring. No on should really appreciate a "Superman" champ who can never lose. It can work with "heels" because the long title reigns make them more hated and you just want to see them lose, but with a "face" champ it just becomes to unbelievable that they came overcome all odds and win. So I also agree we need a new champ.

2007-02-13 14:44:59 · answer #6 · answered by WHEELJACK 4 · 0 0

same here im a cena fan but he has had the title FOR WAY TO DAMN LONG going on 2years just losing the belt for like 4 months. I hope either hbk or orton take the belt away from cena.

in away i hope its orton he really deserves the title but shawn does to

2007-02-13 14:43:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

HBK shud win I like Cena more but he's held it 4 2 long.

2007-02-13 14:42:35 · answer #8 · answered by WizAW3S0ME 5 · 2 0

i can not stnad seeing him each and every week out there running his mouth like a chicken on crack.
i never muted the tv before intil i see him.
i def want to see someone else with that tittle. He has had it for way to long now i think the fans want to see him lose the tittle instead of winning every match.

2007-02-13 17:25:36 · answer #9 · answered by crazziegrl14 5 · 0 0

Like Cena but ready for someone else to have the belst for a while.

2007-02-13 14:47:03 · answer #10 · answered by redstripedmama 4 · 0 0

i totally agree.I would love to see my idol and favorite wrestler hbk the wwe champion 1 more time

2007-02-13 16:09:43 · answer #11 · answered by jamaican babe 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers