Why are people too narrow to distinguish between homophobia and simply not agreeing with homosexuality?

Question

I don't hate gays, but that doesn't mean I have to agree that particular choice of theirs. I can be friends with someone and think they're a nice person without having to agree with every single thing they do. I have a gay friend and I never bring that issue up. Gays are people and there's plenty more to them than just being gay- so I can like them for all the good things about them and what I do agree on them with. For example, if you love your dad but don't agree with him politically, does that mean you HATE him or are intolerant of him? Hell no, you just avoid that particular topic. So when someone is so quick to immediately label someone a "homophobe" just because they don't agree with one particular choice they are being narrow and intolerant themselves. A real liberal should be able to grasp this concept.

Answer 1

Well, I feel that this is an easy one. A lot of people who disagree with homosexuality ARE homophobic...or at least the most vocal ones are. I do agree, you can just simply not agree with that aspect of a person's life and not hate them as a person. I think this needs to be conveyed to the general public though.

I don't really understand either or those feelings, but everyone is entitled to their opinion. I feel that, as long as it does not affect another person, you can pretty much feel/do what you want.

Answer 2

It is the victim syndrome. That is why they are mistakenly trying to identify themselves with actual minorities.
It is not just gays but people in general that wish to tag you as narrow minded, bigoted, or just ignorant for that way they can dismiss you without giving you the common courtesy of weighing your points and addressing the issue.
People here have made an art of ignoring the topic and mudslinging.
I am afraid Truly open minded people that can listen to opposing views and even admit when they are wrong are few and far between.

Answer 3

Agreed.

Answer 4

there's a distinction, yet as time is going on increasingly more desirable fewer human beings are acknowledging the excellence. a million) i imagine viewing homosexuality as a sin is homophobic. it really is taking a view that could no longer your human being, because a e book tells you to imagine that way. And the reason it tells you to imagine that way is because it warns of punishments if homosexuality is finished, or allowed to finish. So that's roots are in worry. no longer an apprehension of the act itself, yet somewhat of the perceived judgment which will come down from it. 2) i do not imagine viewing heterosexuality as a more desirable popular lifestyles type is homophobic. without heterosexuality we does no longer reproduce as a species. If we do not reproduce as a species, we pass extinct. So heterosexuality is a elementary requirement for our lifestyles. Homosexuality performs no such position. that's now to not say that gay persons won't be able to make a contribution to society, yet coming at it from a organic and organic aspect of view, it might want to in elementary words make experience for heterosexuality to be the "default" for people. 3) i imagine attempting as an example someone gay into immediately is largely a waste of time. As with different sexual points of interest, there's a actual change in the mind. which ability it really is particularly not likely that you may want to ever be triumphant in particularly turning someone who's gay into someone immediately. that's an identical clarification why pedophiles won't be able to be rehabilitated. i do not deliver that as a lot as evaluate what both communities do, yet somewhat as an example if that's seen no longer accessible for one crew, you at the on the spot are unlikely to be triumphant with yet another. although, that does no longer advise they were born that way. no human being has ever shown why someone breaks from the 'default' sexuality. no human being has ever shown that all and sundry is born different from that default. And if human beings are not born that way, than there might want to should be exterior aspects unconsciously making them turn that way. If those aspects might want to be spoke of, than theoretically you may want to avert someone from ever turning out to be gay in the first position. it might want to be preventive, somewhat than attempting to remodel someone who has already arrived there.

Answer 5

I agree with you, to a point. It's okay to disagree with homosexuality, insofar as you don't want to practice it. But if, by disagreeing, you mean to control someone else's behavior, then you are becoming discriminatory.

Answer 6

I grasp your concept. You don't hate me, you just don't want me to have all of my rights because I'm gay. Good deal. Thanks.