Does Al-Qadea provide money to Moveon.com and the DNC?
2007-02-13 06:06:56 · 9 answers · asked by BuggerOff 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
If I had ment to mention Bill Clinton, I would have said Bill Clinton...try and stay focused on the questions topic Bilbo.
2007-02-13 06:33:25 · update #1
Nevermor your answer is DOA..Dead on Arrivel.
2007-02-13 06:34:25 · update #2
Nine, I'm not your bro nor do I care to be. Stay focused on the question.
2007-02-13 10:01:55 · update #3
I wouldn't be at all surprised ..given the fact that liberal Democrats hate our way of life..and terrorists have vowed to destroy our free way of life . If Democrats like Hillary Clinton & comrads succeed on the quest for Socialism & Communism , there goes our way of life . Terrorists publically call for Americans to vote Democrat . Who in their right mind who do that knowing they want to take our freedoms away ? No wonder terrorism doesn't bother the democrats in office . Money is changing hands in both directions quicker than Hillary Clinton & John Kerry can get their stories straight . Hillary ran the White House like a Gestapo & told the Secret Service & F.B.I. what to do & what they would & would not do . All the while Bill acted like a good 'ol boy to distract our nation while pretending to be everyone's bumbling buddy . It's getting so they can't even hide their intentions very well anymore .I'm sure one of the reasons liberals are trying to stifle info to the American public is to keep it from being disclosed where the money comes from to fund the war on the war on terror . The money Bill Clinton now earns from foreign governments ( some Communist ) gets 1/2 deposited into Hillary Clinton's bank account..while she runs for U.S. President ..and the biased liberal media thinks that's not important !
2007-02-13 08:23:00 · answer #1 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i do no longer see how this would come as a ask your self to anyone. we've been attacked on 9/eleven and bush, somewhat of certainly going after the lads who attacked us, vented some pent up revenge conflict or pnac nonsense and tried to kit it via fact the conflict on terror - which all questioning human beings be conscious of hasn't began yet. we've not made conflict on the terrorists - why interior the international might they be weaker. bush himself reported that bin encumbered wasn't significant to him and that he did no longer think of roughly him lots - why is anyone stunned that bin encumbered is now as stable as ever. the conflict in iraq is a comedian tale that has been packaged and repackaged, like that undesirable christmas present that keeps getting re-proficient via fact no person fairly needs it. i heavily think of that bush felt that a actual reason in the back of the conflict might advance as we invaded the country. however the pesky data of the particular international stored nosing their way into his little fable international. bush desires help at this factor - he desires to be relieved of command the way a captain could be if he went insane on a similar time as in charge of an naval vessel. we don't stay in a monarchy the place the chief can do something he needs. and right this moment takes unquestionably the cake: bush had a signing fact that somewhat reported that if anyone became found to be impeding the conflict attempt in iraq their possessions would desire to be confiscated. this, greater suitable than the different single element he has executed, famous this type of guy he's. he would not care approximately us, who we voted for and what we want. this guy has have been given to be held in charge, yet owing to the repubs in congress - who's new appropriate chum is the filibuster - he can not be...
2016-12-17 09:10:08 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dear b.o you and dd been busy havnt you what you getting paid bro its not enough to sell your soul ,who provides your money bro
full disclosure
you think our leaders havnt been able to shut down all funding by itself
where your inside knowing come from bro ?
how did you find out your facts
cia [mossad?] ,where you hearing this stuff from?
is it truth or mass destraction ,is it to create fear or hope
its not news to intel
why you telling us?
we cant do anything?
who the hell is dnc move on bro
no more mass destraction
pennytraitor?
2007-02-13 09:59:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No. Paul Bremmer was in charge of distributing 12 billion in cash to the Iraqi's for rebuilding there country and it vanished. I wonder how much of that moeny ended up in the hands of the insurgents? And whose fault would that have been if it did? Let me guess, you'd say Bill Clinton right?
**Hey Bugger, I am very focused. When people like you make ludicrous claims that they can't back up, i love to shove facts right back at them. Have a nice day.
2007-02-13 06:16:38 · answer #4 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 1⤊ 5⤋
I seriously doubt it. If they did, the DNC might be $12 billion
ahead, but truthfully, I think someone should check Darth
Cheney's pockets, his or Halliburton's.
I think Paul Bremmer gave the $12 billion to the RNC, that
would explain why the RNC has more more campaign
money than the DNC.
2007-02-13 06:40:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Kind of seems like it at times doesn't it.
2007-02-13 06:14:34 · answer #6 · answered by BL1957 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
More likely moveon.org provides money to them.
2007-02-13 06:09:38 · answer #7 · answered by Dick Richards 3 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Uh, no. More like something Bush and his Cronies would do.
2007-02-13 06:14:14 · answer #8 · answered by Nevermore 4 · 2⤊ 5⤋
zing!
very clever.
2007-02-13 06:14:19 · answer #9 · answered by dennisjohns23 3 · 5⤊ 1⤋