Whwen new evidence appears that has to do with race why do so called non racist whites become agitated?

Question

I have asked many questions with new evidence about the history of the world. I have also given information that many educated people agree with. If science and new technology says no these things were not done by Europeans as originally thought, but by ******* people, even so called liberals say things like, "What's your point", and "you are racist for bringing this up" , "Why do you feel you need to talk about this", "You must not feel good about yourself", "and you may mean well but you shouldn't be dwelling on what race did what". Well white scholars have been twisting the truth for hundreds of years, why? There are scholars, for examlpe, Zecharia Sitchen who said, "I don't know why some of my peers do not want to admit when they know the Ancient Egyptians were clearly ******* and, there is more than enough evidence to support this fact."Is it wrong to correct an untruth, or only when it comes to European history is it wrong to correct an untruth?

Black people all over the world especially in America have had their history stolen from them, that is why we have so many social problems where ever we go in the world. In America us children of slaves are prospering because of the fact that we have access to information that others don't. We are finding out who we are and it is empowering us. they say if you don't know where you come from you don't know where you're going. That is why it matters to young black children to know their true history. Whites quote Greek, English and Roman philosophers all the time, and it gives them a sense of pride and encourages them to achieve greater things, that is why white historians distorted the truth and wrote things like America was discovered and not stolen in the history books. If your children were taught that your people were savages and then a slave from birth what condition would your people be in? We are still healing. I am not bitter I am an educated brown man in love with his people.

Answer 1

Leaving aside any "race" related issue, the plain and awful truth is this. History can be amended, but never re-written. It is not wrong to correct, it is wrong to make an issue of the correction. At least, thats how I see it.

Answer 2

I think the truth should be known and each individual should get recognition for what they have accomplished in the past, present or future. The people that have made those remarks to you just don't have an answer to your question, or a solution to your problem...so they get defensive. They are wrong in their statements, mind you...but they cannot do anything about it themselves. There is White Supremacy in this world and it is shameful. I think that those INDIVIDUALS that think they are supreme over any other human being are wrong and shameful and yes, some of them have probably tried to change facts to make the white man look better or ahead of the black man or any other race for that matter. I'm sure some people from all races have done this to some other person of another race. I think we just need to hold INDIVIDUALS accountable for their actions and attitudes and not group people together into "races" or stereotypes. Because not all people of a certain race are holding back another race. Not all people of a certain race are "supremacists". You get my idea...look at each person on an individual basis and they may be racist or discriminators...but there are a lot of individuals who are not. You can't say "White Man" is racist or "Black Man" is racist...because not all are. This is my point and I hope it sinks in where it needs to.

Answer 3

Rather than look at things in terms of racial groups, it is more correct to see things as common gene pools. Most gene pools have contributed many types of achievements. Trying to make up some competitive thing between gene pool groups makes little sense. For example, we could say that the gene pool of those in the Caribbean are more sophisticated than those in Scotland because the Scotts only developed the bagpipe while those of the Caribbean developed the steel drum which has a wider approach to music. At the same time, the Scotts actually got the bag pipe from the Romans which also contributed heavily to classical music.

You view music through the study of chords, which is the study of their relationships and functions, forming an important field of music theory called “harmonic analysis.” Which genetic gene pool contributed the most to this field? Or is such a question even meaningful. Each culture has contributed to the field of music in meaningful ways. So too with any other area of human endeavor. Depending on the place and time, the available resources, the connections with past and other current cultures, the incentives for new development, all have contributed.

Look at buildings. We are all aware of the great appreciation of the work on such as the pyramids. Yet, the Celts of Northern Europe predated them with excellent work (such as use of stone in the construction of post and lintel as demonstrated in such works as the grange) and their connection to stellar alignment and seasonal cycles, and yet we hear little of them.

Trying to separate these achieves among some political definition such as race is meaningless. However, to those who consider this important, please, carry on.

Answer 4

All our life experience play a role when we are dealing with the race issue, (or any other topic where one has to take sides. For example, "we" against "them"). We have to admit that all humans have been infected, in some degree, whit biases. We don't like to deal with it, because we do not know how. The fundamental problem lies in the fact that social inequalities, historical memories,group interests, past negative experiences tend to resurface. It will take education to understand and correct this major problem.
An European scientist who was fascinated with "classifications" decided, two centuries ago, that the human race needed also to be classified. Artificially invented names, characteristics, physical appearance, degree of intelligence, etc. etc.
Today,the new paradime is to think and act inclusively. We are one race, in this planet. Please read the profund works of Baha'u'lla, on this topic. Also see the works of Shoghi Effendi, Abdul-Baha and many others.

Answer 5

sturdy question. For that matter, why is it outrageous whilst a white individual calls a black individual the N-word yet no longer whilst a black individual calls yet another black individual the N-word? If it is any such racially offensive term - which that's - then how come they only care whilst a individual who's the "incorrect shade" makes use of it? seems kinda, I dunno, racist perchance? There are all styles of double standards like that nonetheless. gay human beings can say each form of issues approximately quickly human beings and no-one incredibly cares. yet as quickly as a quickly individual says something against a gay individual, whether that's a valid criticism, right this moment they are homophobic, they seem to be a bigot, they seem to be a hater, etc. Or a non-religious individual can say that they do no longer think of something is sturdy, and no-one minds, yet whilst a Christian says the comparable difficulty, right this moment they are accused of being self-righteous and illiberal and judgmental. I hate double standards. the two a behaviour is sturdy and ideal, or it is incorrect. it is not any longer amazing for one demographic and incorrect for yet another. it is not any longer how amazing and incorrect paintings.

Answer 6

Egyptians were a very diverse race, so were many other begining civilizations. You dwelling on the fact that it needs to be mentioned somewhere that they were ******* should make you question yourself. For the most part, Egyptions were Arabic, not European.

Answer 7

Sweetheart, there is only one race--the human race. Arguing over the wrongs done to each other, whether based on race, religion, greed, or whatever do not solve problems. Look at Martin Luther King, Jr. He wanted to help bring all Americans together regardless of skin color. And he has been made into such an icon that his dreams are not being fulfilled. Calling ourselves African-Americans or Irish-Americans or Italian-Americans or Polish-Americans or Hispanic-Americans does nothing to bring us together. At some point you have to learn
forgiveness and leave justice for past wrongs in the hands of God. He is trustworthy for it. And we all need to work to bring
about unity in this country. People don't like what you say because you letting the past keep you from moving forward and you are trying to do the same to them.

I hope you can let your bitterness go and begin to live and move and think of yourself as an American first. That is how I look at all people no matter their so-called race. Because truly there is only one race--the human race--and we can all trace our genealogy back to Noah.

Answer 8

Because ultimately, there is no point to be scored when it comes to race. Ancient Egyptians were a combination of races. Now, let's assume they were homogeneous and *****. What difference does it actually make in the plane of reality?

Answer 9

you have to go back to the nort of the serengetti plains to the great rift valley to see the oldest foot prints or our race the human race are there she was a black woman with a child on her hip 50 million years ago thet our oldest proven ancestor according to Dr Leeky so the inferance is all life began in that area and spread out and north to UR and the three rivers we are all the children not of EVE but of that woman in Africa

Answer 10

Maybe I don't get it...Is being Egyptian an accomplishment that white people want credit for?