English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What's the core difference between Warsaw ghettos and indian reservations? Seggregation is seggregation, whether it is voluntary or forcible. Is it alright?

Some Seminoles are entitled to and must abide by the Seminole nation law, when they have a certain perdentage of "Seminole Blood". Is this covert racism?

2007-02-13 04:59:19 · 6 answers · asked by Malcolm Knoxville 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

6 answers

The rezes are whats left of our tribal land they should be sovereign in all aspects and if the treaties were honored we'd have much more land

2007-02-13 06:02:54 · answer #1 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 2 0

I don't think you understand what a reservation is. No one is forced to live in a reservation. Indians can live where they like.

Try to remember that all of the US used to belong to the Indians. They sold Manhattan and a few other bits to settlers but everything else was just plain stolen from the Indians. Reservations are the last little bits of America the government promises not to steal. They are not jails or ghettos.

2007-02-13 05:11:53 · answer #2 · answered by Queen of Cards 4 · 3 1

I think reservation quota should be done away with because firstly it takes the focus of the institution away from quality education to quantity, but also it perpetuates the very inequality it was supposed to remove like caste, religion etc. If you have to have quota then it should be on the economic situation only of a candidate. The reservation system is reverse discriminating people on their religion, castes, and then our country claims to be secular. Ironic, isn't it!!!

2016-05-24 05:39:40 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No. I think we should dissolve them and restore indians to their historic lands. Sort of like USA meets Zionism in our backyard instead of the middle east.

2007-02-13 05:04:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

We had that in South Africa they called it apartheid. Its not right the land should be given back to the Indians that was taken forcefully from them.

2007-02-13 05:09:32 · answer #5 · answered by chersgaz 4 · 2 1

I think indian reservations are ridiculous and do not agree with them. One side lost, one side won. To the victor the spoils.

2007-02-13 05:06:15 · answer #6 · answered by TexMan98 2 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers