Would the world likely to become a better place to be if more women were presidents?

Question

I have heard people saying that most women more often than not like to follow their own instincts/feelings rather than stick to facts when it comes to making important decisions in highly sensitive positions as it is the case for the heads of states or presidents. Do you really believe this is the case or just hogwash? In either case, please, give enough arguments to back it up. Thanks.

Answer 1

Balance would be good. It would should equal opportunity, it would show acceptance. As for governance, who knows? There are probably as good and bad male and female leaders. It should all be about capability, experience, intelligence, passion and compassion.

Answer 2

Opinionated answers will come from this.

England's Woman and Germany's Woman leaders are/were very right wing politicians. Hilary Clinton is more liberal. There is no evidence that Cleopatra was a failed monarch and Catherine of Russia was possibly the best leader of that nation.

The question itself is sexist and deserves no more comment.

It's not "hogwash"! It is wrong!!!

Answer 3

That is a helluva question. Often times, I have wondered that myself. If you are caught behind enemy lines & are interrogated by a women & do not respond to her liking, you are more likely to be tortured by her, than if your questioner was male. Don't know.

Answer 4

i suspect so, as long as the women who came to power were not at all similar to the useless and small minded politicians who are currentlt in power globally!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/people/features/wiwp/index.shtml
http://www.guide2womenleaders.com/women_state_leaders.htm

Answer 5

It's all to do whith their pesonality if their mean no and if their nice yes.

Answer 6

yeah, sure