English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Adoption is okay for normal families with not much money to spare. But for people like madonna who have so much money: why didn't she spend it on constructing a shelter and sanitary, clean conditions and water in the villages. She should have donated some money to them so they all come up to middle class living standards rather than bringing one child into the upper class.

(for those who can't be bothered to read all of that)

SUMMARY:

Whay did she bring ONE child out of poverty and into the upper class livving standards, instead of bring a WHOLE VILLAGE out of poverty and living a middle class life with clean water, food and basic education.

2007-02-13 03:57:01 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

2 answers

Saving even one child cannot be considered to be a bad thing. She has also contributed 3 million dollars to that area in order to help the other children. I'm not a fan of Madonna's music, but I am now a fan of her heart.

2007-02-13 04:15:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

With all her money i'm surprised she didn't take 10 kids,and if you cared to hear the full story she did give money to help the village.
But on the other hand, do you feel the same way for the ophaned kids living in the US.

2007-02-13 16:03:56 · answer #2 · answered by Countess 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers