1. Were a shameless giveaway to the obscenely rich
2. Saved me money, but not nearly as much as my offshore tax shelter
3. Would have been better spent securing our ports, borders and nuclear plants against possible terrorist attack
4. Were a nice start, but I won't be satisfied until we have a 15% flat tax and government is shrunk to a size where it can be drowned in the bathtub
2007-02-13 03:37:34 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ok, I can answer this one - Number 4.
2007-02-13 03:39:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
1 and 3
2007-02-13 11:40:00 · answer #2 · answered by sydb1967 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
all but no. 2
2007-02-13 11:47:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely 4! But it's got to be flat down to the first $1 earned, regardless of total income.
2007-02-13 11:47:30 · answer #4 · answered by Michael E 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Number 4 is the choice
2007-02-13 11:46:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
5. Fueled a recovery that still continues despite restrictive monetary policy and that has produced INCREASED federal revenue and increased economic mobility. The rich are richer - but they're also a lot more numerous.
2007-02-13 11:41:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Were a shameless giveaway to the obscenely rich
2007-02-13 11:41:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
4.
AND
5. "Pulled the economy back from the brink of recession after 9-11."
2007-02-13 11:40:04 · answer #8 · answered by I hate friggin' crybabies 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋
I have to go with #4
2007-02-13 11:43:04 · answer #9 · answered by BigRichGuy 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I pick one and three. I'd also pick 2, but I don't have an offshore tax shelter.
2007-02-13 11:40:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋