English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It doesn't make sense, but truthfully Mary Kate Olsen has way, way more talent than Ashley Olsen. Does anyone agree?

2007-02-13 03:17:15 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Television

8 answers

I don't think either of them have that much talent - they were just cute girls with big eyes, but that's not exactly a talent.

Hiring their brilliant business managers, however, was genious. I don't know who was responsible for that, but bravo.

2007-02-13 03:21:57 · answer #1 · answered by Kris B 5 · 0 1

I don't think that Mary Kate has more talent then Ashley. I think they have a big ego. First of all, they were cute when they were younger (on Full House). Now look at them. No producers would want to give them any roles. The fame of Full House and their cuteness got to their heads. All washed up.

2007-02-13 04:25:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I disagree with that too!! I think they are both very talented!! And I like Ashley better then Mary-kate.

2007-02-13 03:23:57 · answer #3 · answered by Jennie♥ 3 · 0 1

how come Mary Kate is somehow more talked about than Ashley.
MK had an eating disorder and dated more high profile people whereas Ashley is quieter in the celeb pages.
they just look like baby monkeys..

2007-02-13 03:55:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

they're the comparable age as my daughter or maybe seem comparable... I watched them advance up on complete abode and we've all of their movies....i be conscious of it sounds stupid, yet they have been such a factor of our relatives. I hated it whilst Mary Kate had to flow to rehab and seeing all the tabloids on the save cabinets broke my coronary heart. i'm hoping they're in a position to comply with their ever changinging roles in existence and are satisfied

2016-12-17 09:04:11 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

they are connected at the hip, dress like old bag ladies and do nothing but milk money from the prepubscent little girls that still buy their sweatshop made goods,,, there is no difference in talent since they have not done anything fresh in years together or apart.

2007-02-13 07:00:01 · answer #6 · answered by Chazz Drizzler 5 · 1 1

I disagree with that. They both are talented!

2007-02-13 03:22:09 · answer #7 · answered by DJ Cowboy 2 · 1 1

I think they're both talented,beautiful,and cool!

2007-02-13 03:51:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers