The yoyo is on the string. A string without the yoyo is still a string, but a yoyo without the string is ....(a disk with a groove in it?)
2007-02-13 02:54:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Shona L 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
it's not a question of the yoyo being on the string or vice versa, it's more likely to be the string attached to the yoyo. YO! :)
2007-02-17 00:01:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by irokoisPLISKIN 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is obvious that the yoyo is on the string.
2007-02-13 04:35:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
technicoally the string is on the yoyo, it's wrapped around the yoyo, so I think the string is on the yoyo.
It could be argued either way tho, the yoyo is held by the string or soemthing, idk, I think it's the string is on the yoyo
2007-02-13 04:02:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Itt 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both together...one without the other would not constitute a yo-yo.
2007-02-13 10:34:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its either. It make no difference.
2007-02-13 02:53:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by briggs 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
what came first the chicken or the egg lol!!!
2007-02-13 02:41:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by gillian h 2
·
0⤊
0⤋