In 1991, Dr. Robin Fox, then editor of the British medical journal The Lancet, visited the Home for Dying Destitute in Calcutta and described the medical care the patients received as "haphazard". Dr. Fox criticised Teresa claiming that her order did not distinguish between curable and incurable patients, putting curable patients at risk.
Fox conceded that the regimen he observed included cleanliness, the tending of wounds and sores, and kindness, but he noted that the sisters' approach to managing pain was "disturbingly lacking". The formulary at the facility Fox visited lacked strong analgesics which he felt clearly separated Mother Teresa's approach from the hospice movement. Fox also wrote that needles were rinsed with warm water, which left them inadequately sterilized, and the facility did not isolate patients with tuberculosis.
Then he went back to his comfortable home, and Theresa and nuns were left to cope on their own. If he was so concerned, why didn't he do something?
2007-02-13
02:22:32
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
It's easy to criticize. He never lifted a finger or helped that dying people. Is he a hypocrite?
2007-02-13
02:24:13 ·
update #1