Its pretty much been proven at this point that they trumped up or out right lied about intelligence information, that they appointed unqualified personal to top positions.
2007-02-13 01:24:02 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
They didnt lie??? They didnt give a direct link to Iraq and 9/11, and then outright say 'No there is no connection'. They never said 'Saddam has weapons of mass destruction'?
2007-02-13 08:54:25 · update #1
. No, I don't like being betrayed. I voted for him the first time, when I was in the military for 10 years. I quickly learned the hard truth. his politics ruined a good career for me. and ruined the country which has backtracked 250 years to an age of tyranny. I was one of those who was fooled. and to think our government has our interest in mind is just sickening. I can't say I believe in the system anymore. republicans or democrats have the interest of world banks and world government. which I don't agree with. sadly the people of this country are being tricked with every lie coming from these politicians spew. and Change within this system is improbable or possible at this point. and to think i used to be hopeful.
2007-02-13 01:39:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How is it PRETTY MUCH PROVEN? Either it is or isn't. Everything This administration has said came from CLINTON's mouth. There were WMD'S Saddam gassed his own people with them. 180,000 dead women,children and men. Why didn't we find any of that gas? Was he all out? 17 UN Resolutions against him. Nothing i say will matter to you. You are a typical Bush basher because he stole your election. 911 was plotted and planned under Clinton. The terrorists have been fighting for their lives ever since. They are too busy dying to come here and do it again. Thanks to a strong Republican President. That is pretty much proven too.
2007-02-13 09:38:08 · answer #2 · answered by carolinatinpan 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely!!!! Cheney is spelled with an E not an A. 9/11 was never a lie.
2007-02-13 09:33:21 · answer #3 · answered by Faith White 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, it hasn't been proven. They didn't outright lie, that would be William Jefferson Clinton who ended up losing his law license over his perjury. Get the facts straight (difficult for a liberal I know) then ask the questions.
Yes, I would vote for them again, the only worse thing would be putting the man who invented the internet in office like Gore.
2007-02-13 09:27:57 · answer #4 · answered by Lt. Dan reborn 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
If the dems fielded the same candidates. Yes I would vote for Bush and Cheney again. Even knowning what I know now.
2007-02-13 09:52:12 · answer #5 · answered by what? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. The alternatives were worse. Gore and Kerry were all over the map. I was for this, before I was for that. I invented this, I invented that. I'm a Alpha Man, a Bravo Man. Had either one of them ran a scripted campaign, stayed disciplined, stayed consistent, they would have won. And I don't agree with your premise that they lied. Hindsight makes all of us brilliant.
2007-02-13 09:47:59 · answer #6 · answered by Matt 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely, Yes.
2007-02-17 00:42:11 · answer #7 · answered by crusty old fart 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES! But look at your hate,& how dare you act like you
can judge anyone,much less some one like a President
whose father was also a President,just because you
don't think he did things right? Who are you that I should
care what you think? I am sick of you insulting the United
States President!
2007-02-13 09:36:07 · answer #8 · answered by Dyannah 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, it's impossible to vote for Bush again, since he has reached his term limit, but I would vote for Cheney in a heartbeat... (maybe not the best phrase to use when referring to VP Cheney).
2007-02-13 09:28:26 · answer #9 · answered by theearlybirdy 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I voted for them.
Twice.
Given the alternatives (Gore and Kerry) I'd do it again, even knowing what I know now.
2007-02-13 09:31:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋