Yes, but see now they can say "look we did nothing" which is what Democrats are famous for anyway. Look how successful Hillary was with universal health-care. It isn't going to change things if she gets elected other than to remove 2nd amendment rights of citizens.
2007-02-13 01:23:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lt. Dan reborn 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Try to work on your understanding of issues. Congress funded Defense at $498 billion in 2006 for 2007. Funding is not a real issue.
Now you tell me. Why is it that our service members do not have the armor they need in Iraq?
2007-02-13 01:54:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by jl_jack09 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They discovered the situation isn't as simple as they thought it was. I'll wager they finally decide a troop increase is prudent after a bunch of hoopla.
2007-02-13 01:30:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by .... . .-.. .-.. --- 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
What the heck made you think that the dumbpublicans would have a different policy than the repugnocrats?
2007-02-13 01:45:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by jcboyle 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Which course? Stay and lose? or leave and live? Dumbya has botched this thing and now chickenhawks are trying to blame the dems.
2007-02-13 01:28:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
They fear showing what they stand for. They know they are out of step with most of America. They stand for saying whatever will line their pockets or get them laid.
2007-02-13 01:22:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by carolinatinpan 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
No, they still want to get us out of Iraq. Let's move them back to where the fight is suppose to be, Afghanistan!
2007-02-13 01:22:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by ropemancometh 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Don't think for a minute that Bush won't be withdrawing by this time next year.
2007-02-13 01:23:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by I'll Take That One! 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Basically-- yep.
2007-02-13 01:55:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋