2007-02-13 00:41:10 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
In the long run I would say Obama. The problem is he would need to be handed a country not in war or debt. Give Hillary eight years to accomplish those goals first.
2007-02-14 18:43:56 · answer #1 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in my view, I hate how polls consistently divide the vote by means of race and gender, as this promotes racism and segregation. even however, at a recent caucus in my state, Obama supporters have been a great mix of race, gender, and age. Out of 500+ human beings, basically one million black woman and one million black guy stood on Clinton's section. besides, different the different Clinton supporters appeared to be older and frequently women folk. This shows that Obama can and could deliver the rustic mutually as one usa the place race, age, and gender will improve right into a controversy of the previous. Obama for united statesa.!!!
2016-12-17 15:27:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There would be nothing wrong with having a first black or first woman president but neither of the two candidates are what the country needs at this time.
2007-02-13 00:51:10 · answer #3 · answered by Doug B 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree with another answerer that their race and gender are completely irrelevant. If I were just to compare them as people, I would say Obama is the more trustworthy and "presidential" of the two. The only thing I worry about with either of these candidates is that people will not be able to see past race and gender and we will end up with another loser like George Bush for another 4-8 years.
2007-02-13 01:36:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rephrase your question as follows:
Obama or Clinton - which would be MORE beneficial to humanity?
Gender and race are irrelevant, and "most" is reserved for three or greater in a comparison.
2007-02-13 00:49:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That is like asking would I want you to gouge out my left eye, or my right eye. Neither choice makes much sense. Obama just isn't as well known for any mistakes yet, Hillary is famous for them.
2007-02-13 01:29:56 · answer #6 · answered by Lt. Dan reborn 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Humanity will be unaffected by them both.
2007-02-13 01:02:11 · answer #7 · answered by Dr. NG 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
did she not cause enough crap when she ran the country 1st time
and this other loser obama ok when i 1st seen it i thought why is she talking to a terrorist they want dead
2007-02-13 00:52:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Neither - they are both worthless
2007-02-13 00:48:43 · answer #9 · answered by J 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋