English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

Since when has diplomacy become appeasement?

2007-02-13 00:34:54 · answer #1 · answered by .... . .-.. .-.. --- 4 · 2 0

Let's face it, Bush is a "fun guy," and after 3 1/2 years in Iraq he's decided appeasing Kim would probably be more fun than invading him! Anyway, it's not "appeasment," it's called "diplomacy," and came out of six-nation talks that it took a long time for us to join into. It's also what should have been done in Iraq 4 years ago. And for the sake of the U.S., Korea and the rest of the world, I for one hope the agreement is real and that it holds!!!

2007-02-13 00:00:57 · answer #2 · answered by worldinspector 5 · 2 1

bush have no choice but kiss kim jong il's butt, america knows they would lose a war against korea, like they are losing in iraq

2007-02-13 00:00:08 · answer #3 · answered by lat0ria 3 · 2 2

Clinton betrayed America. He gave nukes to NKorea.

Clinton let Al Qaeda's 9-11 pilots train in the U.S. --- IN THE FREAKING U.S.!!

Clinton failed to follow a known terrorist --- Bin Laden.

Thank God for President Bush.

Clinton cried while Libya tried to build WMDs.

2007-02-12 23:55:30 · answer #4 · answered by duck 2 · 4 5

Standing ovation!

Great post!

2007-02-12 23:55:34 · answer #5 · answered by Timothy B 3 · 2 4

Its not nice to be mad at retarded folks!

They can't help it they are so ignorant!

2007-02-12 23:56:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Damned if you do, damned if you don't

2007-02-13 00:05:58 · answer #7 · answered by slodana2003 4 · 1 1

As a republican i am ashamed........ we shoulda nuked him.......

2007-02-12 23:57:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 6

fedest.com, questions and answers