Why is Capital Punishment less humane than the murders and crimes people commit?

Question

just curious as to others opinion

Answer 1

I am a firm believer in the eye for an eye saying. I feel we should bring back public hangings in cases where there is no question the person is guilty. Why should my tax dollars pay to incarcerate an individual on life without parole. I know people argue that the death sentence does not deter crime. I feel that is because the public does not see the sentence carried out. Putting them on public display if it does no more than deter one individual from committing a horrific crime then in my opinion it is worth it.

Answer 2

It's not about being "more" or "less humane", regardless of your position; I generally support "humane" capital punishment, though there have been more than a few I'd like to see strung up by their genitalia in the public square.

The issue is that any morally sound person must recognize that two wrongs don't make a right, nor does execution undo a wrong, however horrific, and that vengeance is never an answer. This "someone's gotta pay" attitude by the general public, which translates into elected sheriffs, prosecutors, and judges that feel obligated to provide a "perpetrator". More than a few known or suspected innocents, particularly minorities and the poor, have been sent to the gallows over the years because someone had an election coming up.

Answer 3

The premise of your question is misleading - it's not that it is "less humane than the crimes" - the capital punishment discussion doesn't center around the crimes others commit, it's simply do we have the right to play God and take someone else's life for ANY purpose (ie: an individual can't do it, but the institution can - double standard?). Personnally, I'm not sure where I fall on the debate, I have certainly seen some criminals that I didn't want around any more...

Answer 4

As a speech it is poor some thing like this must be provided with interest (ditto in case you've been arguing on the different aspect.) at the same time as actual, the presentation is bland. My regular written position fact, that you're welcome to borrow from is: i'm hostile to it because it in trouble-free terms would paintings if murderers were able to rational concept quite of being triggered through alcohol, drugs and testosterone. The demise penalty will be a commonplace characteristic in the documents yet in authentic existence, it isn't even a blip on the criminal radar show and hasn't been major for over a century. in the course of the most suitable one hundred years, the most persons finished in a unmarried 3 hundred and sixty 5 days grow to be 198 in 1935. For a u . s . of three hundred million those who's statistically 0 and the 50 or so in 2007 is quite insignificant at the same time as placed next with the type of murders that take position. If it grow to be done away with completely the speed reductions will be spent in approaches that forestall murders. lots of the fee is up the front on the learn and trial degree and serves in trouble-free terms to enable grandstanding prosecutors pander to the regular public through exhibiting how troublesome they are. there will be a marvelous volume of help for the demise penalty yet i don't think of maximum persons comprehend how a lot of a no longer some thing it is. In my state, California, there has been about one execution each and every 3 years because the demise penalty grow to be reinstated. There are over six hundred inmates on demise row so at that cost it is going to take a million,800 years to kill all of them provided we do not get any more beneficial. the most undemanding reason behind demise on demise row is organic causes referred to through suicide. deadly injection is a much off 0.33. The fee of holding capital punishment is enormous. as an get mutually, the state of Maryland figures it has spent $37 Million each and each and every for the executions it has done considering reinstating the demise penalty. once you look on the costs, this can be a criminal waste of the regular public's money.

Answer 5

I think the United States should switch to capital punishment, after a small time of people being more dangerous to cover their tracks, it would even out and be a safer less crime filled place to live. Just compare our statistics to countries that do have capital punishment.

Answer 6

I think DrJunk explained the anti-cp position pretty well.

I disagree with them, though. The purpose of the courts is to dispense justice. Justice, for someone who has murdered, it to be executed. This is not done in passion, for money, for revenge, etc. It is done because it is just. The reason we have a jury system and why jurists can't have formed an opinion before the trial is to ensure the verdict is arrived at because of the evidence, not by emotion.

Answer 7

It's not less "humane"
It's a more humane punishment than their victims received.

Answer 8

less - we had a 9 year old girl raped and buried alive in Florida

what less humane do you want from the murderer who confessed?

Answer 9

Maybe we should feed the criminals to lions? Will that be more humane than putting them to sleep.