Why Do Dems Cut Down Most Successful Blacks ...?

Question

... and try to keep their kids in lousy schools while the Dems send their kids to private schools?

Answer 1

Because they want to keep black folks uneducated, dumb, and fighting amoungst themselves. They LOVE coloured folks that use race as their means of advancement, Jessee Hijackson, Sharpton, etc. But let a coloured person advance by their owns means, then they're too white, or they sold out their people.

Answer 2

Its already been shown that Democrats are less educated and poorer as a whole than Republicans as a whole. So I don't understand where the whole elite Democrat thing comes from. We are Democrats and hes a truck driver and I'm a housewife, real elite there, our kids went to public schools and worked to go to college, again no handouts or private schools they didn't pay dearly for. Yet the president the Republicans revere is a private school boy all the way from his preschool to his grad school, and I'm supposed to believe hes a good ole boy? The rich of any political stripe send their kids to the best schools possible, they understand the importance of meeting the movers and shakers of the next generation and set the stage for the cronyism of the next batch of politicians. That too cuts both ways.
Sure, Dems might cut down successful blacks on occasion, but the Republicans left them swinging.
So spare me your hand wringing.

Answer 3

Basically because the Dems are the party of the poor and the only way they can keep your vote is to keep you poor. They don't cut down liberal successful blacks only conservative ones like Clarence Thomas, Condi Rice and too a certain degree Colin Powell. This is because these individuals did not believe the liberal lies that if your black you can't succeed in the US unless you are a star athelete or a talk show host. It is for proving that success is based far more on the individual and not on a persons skin color and that you can do it without waiting for the liberals to "fix" the system that they are so despised!

Answer 4

Why do Republicans flow decrease back to Carter? That became over 30 years in the past. it is humorous how Republicans will flow decrease back 30 years in a pathetic attempt to state that issues have been worse. perhaps so, yet we at the instant are not residing interior the previous, we live interior the present. The party of private duty would desire to take duty. it is likewise humorous how Republicans bypass Bush Sr and flow without delay to Reagan. i assume they like something human beings elect to neglect "no new taxes" and closing of protection rigidity bases. a minimum of he dealt with Iraq wisely. so some distance as Reagan is in contact, he did win ninety% of the Electoral Vote in 2 elections and you're appropriate, he could no longer have executed it without ton of Democrat voters giving him their help. And once you had the innovations (Carter & Dukkakis) it wasn't a tricky decision. He did some questionable issues like no longer communicate a pair of.I.D.S., Iran-Contra, arming Bin encumbered and Saddam Hussein, and inspite of a inventory marketplace crash, he became nonetheless an excellent chief and an excellent President. we certainly would desire to apply yet another guy like Reagan.

Answer 5

I'm sorry it's the Democrats trying to keep kids in lousy schools?

I don't think so.

George W. Bush signed into law an education bill that was written by Senator Edward Kennedy. Bush then invited Kennedy to the bill's signing ceremony at a high school in Ohio. Bush took that opportunity to introduce Kennedy by calling him "a fabulous senator" and "a good man." He repeated his praise for Kennedy in the next State of the Union Address.

After Bush signed the bill into law, conservatives fumed. Rush Limbaugh referred to it as "the Ted kennedy authored education bill." Hannity called the bill "a disappointment." Conservative columnist Robert Novak said on CNN the bill "turns its back on choice (vouchers)" and characterized the administration's "sharp turn to the left."

Bush had GOP majorities in Congress and could have pushed for vouchers. He didin't.

And now you want to blame the Dems for keeping blacks in "loucy schools?"

Give us a break!

Answer 6

Dems need to keep blacks down to support the old Lie. They never forgave the republicans for freeing them and never wanted to let them go. The fact that Blacks still vote for them is the saddest fact off all. Not unlike the Blacks that went into Africa to grab other Blacks for sale to whites waiting on the coast of Africa, the Jesse Jackson and other Black Power brokers still deliver Blacks to white democrats.

Answer 7

Say what? The Dem's I know (myself included) can't afford to send their kids to private schools, lol. And I've never cut down successful blacks. Where exactly do you get your info from? Oh I know....Fox. Nevermind.

Answer 8

I don`t know but i see your point. The dems always wanna keep the blacks down and give them handouts

Answer 9

If you're talking about Larry Elder and Alan Keyes, they don't need anyone to cut them down. Those fools dig their own holes.

Answer 10

because they are their pride and joys, Blacks are the people who let the democrat party take care of them. In doing so they are too ignorant to realize that in reality they are keeping them down, making them come to rely on their pity handouts instead of encouraging individualism and giving them the tools they need to better themselves. Nobody lives a good life on welfare, sorry but NOBODY !