Some other dictators that maim, oppress,kill and threaten children, women etc are in Bhutan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Zimbabwe, Korea, Turkmenistan etc.
Now we know Saddam had NOTHING to do with 911, so out of all the dictators why did Bush pick Saddam?
2007-02-12 23:26:27 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
taxi..how was he the worst/ can u give details or a valid link/
2007-02-12 23:34:51 · update #1
He was the worst of the bad mans.
2007-02-12 23:29:51 · answer #1 · answered by taxidriver 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
There are many reasons he chose to oust Saddam but really none of them truly valid for ousting. He had personal grudges against Saddam for his attempt assination on his father during the Gulf War. He is an oil man, and does want to control the supply, more about the prices of oil then the actual oil. The conditions in Iraq today are worse since the overthrow of the government then when Saddam was in power. He is just the first that Bush picked I honestly think he would like to overthrow many other dictators.
2007-02-12 23:35:26 · answer #2 · answered by Sarah M 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Iran is a Democracy we've thousands of troops in South Korea and the North has been monitored via employing the U. S. and Japan protection stress constantly for the previous fifty six years. Zimbabwe is supposedly a Democracy I truthfully have no concept what we could earnings from ousting the Bhutanese government. they are quite inocuous. Saudi Arabia is an ultimate chum indoors the section and the U. S. has protection stress bases there, it probable does no longer be a sturdy precedent to set via employing toppling a regime which permits your protection stress to ascertain there an video prepare the section i do no longer comprehend approximately Turkmenistan. Saddam grew to become of direction the rogue elephant with the main danger to reason a topic - He has attacked the worldwide places of Iran, Kuwait and Israel mutually as he had the possibility. there grew to become no reason to think of of he grew to become reformed.
2016-10-02 01:47:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam INVADED Kuwait previously and was still under UN sanctions which allowed US to set an EXAMPLE to ruthless dictators like those who live in Bhutan, Saudi Arabia, Iran Zimbabwe, Korea, Turkmenistan etc. So are you suggesting we invade these countries ALSO?
2007-02-12 23:38:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Oil, and the fact that saddam had put a hit out on W's daddy.
2007-02-12 23:32:44 · answer #5 · answered by plhudson01 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is the law that ousted Saddam for the grave offenses he has committed . You should not hrow the blame to President Bush.Study very hard the offenses done by Saddam before blaming someboy who has nothing to do with the ouster. You are still young to realixze the matter
2007-02-12 23:32:48 · answer #6 · answered by Jesus M 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Oil
2007-02-12 23:34:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oil
2007-02-12 23:30:09 · answer #8 · answered by bonshui 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
america only picks on the weak and crippled, iraq was under some pretty heavy sanctions for years and after a while america felt it was weak enough for attack. but little do the americans understand what patriotism is all about, people resent occupation and fight back! they expected flowers and candy, the rest of the world not buying the propaganda knew it would be rpg and 7.62mm they would be receiving
2007-02-12 23:35:19 · answer #9 · answered by lat0ria 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
because other dictators don't have anything worthy for Bush. Oil and other resources were the main aim...
2007-02-12 23:29:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
He defied international law. The US and its coalition partners were enforcing a UN resolution.
2007-02-12 23:33:40 · answer #11 · answered by robbob 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋