does anyone find howard k. stern suspiceous at all??? it all seems a little too fishey. with annas son dead he wouldnt inherit the money and with anna dead she doesnt have any use for it anymore, and if that baby is his it seems like he just killed anna and her son so that he could have the money from his so called child. i dont think its his anyways. idiot.
2007-02-12 22:53:04 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
i think howard was very controling of anna before her death and before her son death. i have begin to wonder if howard caused all the prombles between anna and her family ?howard is very shady because u never sleep with your clinet. i feel if howard is still lawyer he should be dis bar. come on the cops should look at howard because anna son dies and now anna dies being around this man . their are a lot of questions that is un answerd. i feel they should take the dna of the baby and i dont think he is the father either. come on every one know that anna was coming in to money howard was broke so he killed anna and her son for money hello the cops need to awake up . their is a baby and thye need to get the baby out of this mans hands
2007-02-15 13:10:33 · answer #1 · answered by crystal w 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, there's is something fishy about that guy. First of all, if he really is the father, why don't he subject the baby and himself for a DNA test just to prove Larry Birkhead wrong. What is he afraid of if he really is the father? Second, the drugs that killed Daniel is again found in the refrigerator in Anna Nicole's house. If he really loved Anna Nicole, he would have prevented Anna Nicole from using those drugs, no matter how devastated she is of her son's death.
I don't know, but I really have a feeling that this is murder (both Daniel and Anna Nicole), and I also have this feeling that somehow Howard K. Stern is "connected" to the family of the late husband of Anna Nicole - the 89-year old oil tycoon. Remember, the $80-million inheritance is still being contested by the family.
2007-02-13 00:13:13 · answer #2 · answered by Jeanna! Jeanna! 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i have thought this as well....
Lets just say that he gave Daniel something - Daniel overdoses-dies- ok, Anna who is completely healthy - just had a baby - sad yet able to function (we all viewed her on TV) then 5 months after Daniel - Anna is found dead. Yes, we have all had the flu and how many of us have bumped our heads when we fell down. Howard was Annas lawyer before and HE is the one that drew up the will that Anna had before she had the new baby. So now we have a will that HE knew about and everything in the will went to Daniel. Then few months after the will - boom - Daniel dies.Now Anna 5 months later. So, now since he is acting as caretaker of this baby he is in charge of all the money. SUSPICIOUS??? U-BETCHA!!!
2007-02-12 23:04:18 · answer #3 · answered by bufalo1501 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it is his either. However supposedly he hasn't been asked for a DNA sample only LB wants to test if he (LB) is the father. I wonder where HKS is going to go IF he is deported from the Bahamas. He won't be considered a resident he if doesn't own the house, which he won't because they weren't married. In order for him to inherit anything he'll have to show up in a US court at some point. I don't think Anna ever saw this coming. He didn't draw up the will, he is 1st executor though
2007-02-12 23:11:28 · answer #4 · answered by justme 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At her perfect she turned right into a alluring lady, regrettably we seldom suggested her at her perfect. i think very sorry for that undesirable sufferer. She become surrounded through advisers who, in reality, wanted some thing from her, that Howard ok Stern become the worst of the bunch. She is lengthy previous now and it isn't lengthy and some "blond bombshell" will fill the void she left. weren't all of us drained of her yet ought to hardly wait to work out what got here next in the saga, so a lengthy way as that is going the saga gained't have reached it is end. are not we on the fringe of our chairs to take heed to the comments in 5 weeks.
2016-11-27 19:51:56 · answer #5 · answered by mcintire 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thatz what my friend thinks and ever since she told me that I started thinking about that. Cause I mean what are the odds that the deaths were so similar to each other.
2007-02-15 13:07:57 · answer #6 · answered by tRaCi3 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The baby would inherit the money and it would be put in a trust fund until she reaches adulthood.
2007-02-12 22:56:58 · answer #7 · answered by Debra D 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I thought about that too, if he IS in any way behind the deaths of her and her son... wow... he's got some balls.
2007-02-12 23:01:08 · answer #8 · answered by Jacob S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i am ssssssssoooo sick of hearing about this
2007-02-12 23:58:11 · answer #9 · answered by ride4thepride 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋