Similarities and differences between tsarist rule and communsite rule in russia?

Answer 1

Under tsarist rule - strong class system - "God - tsar - nobility (dvoriane) - peasants". (In some ways like in European countries).

Under communist rule - redistribution of resources - rule of the proletariat (workers). There was an attempt to break away from previous traditions. After revolution there was civil war and the middle class was to a large extent removed (army officers, nobility, kulaks etc...), and class barriers wre eroded.

Answer 2

Tsarist rule was typified by a rigid class structure, where there was no mobility as such between the classes ... peasants worked the land for feudal masters and lived off what they could produce, surplus to the requirements of the masters - this was supplemented by the produce of other serfs.

Under Communist rule, the class hierarchy was abolished and replaced with a collectivist approach, whereby everyone worked for the nation/party and resources were resdistributed according to equal need (in theory).

Land and property were no longer in the hands of a priveleged few, but were held by the state, which would provide equally to all the citizens of that state.

Monopolies could no longer exist under communism, and the hardships and privations caused by tsarist rule should have been eradicated.. however, the structure of the communist party allowed for a hierarchy to emerge from the very earliest times.

Stratification exists and will exist in all societies, regardless of doctrine. What happened with the revolution was that people began to struggle in order to produce goods and services for the state and not for themselves ... the cold war meant that a large part of the state's economy was invested in the military and in technological development to further the nuclear deterrent ... all of this effort occurred at the expense of "general living" requirements.

This equated with the struggle of the serf, to provide the means for his/her feudal master to dress well, or have a fine looking troika!!

The respective doctrines are completely different in theory .. but, in practice ... the end result is rather similar - bad news for the guys at the "bottom of the pile".

Read "1984" by George Orwell... it's all in there ... from both sides!!

Answer 3

The two were similar in several ways - despite what communist doctrine would say. Under Tsarist rule there was a feudal system where the great majority of people were essentially serfs and they passed the fruits of their farm labor up to someone above them who redistributed it for them. Communism in the Soviet Union ran under a system of collective farms, which were owned by the government. People farmed the land and passed their products on up to the govt. for redistribution.

Both states were devastatingly dictatorial, with life and death consequences for disagreement with the state.

Communism mostly eliminated the class system. There were no more serfs and rich land owners, but I say sort of because the top people in the communist government were doing quite a bit better then the average factory worker.

Anyway there's more but that's a start.

Answer 4

the version is that Scorpio, to boot to being governed through Mars is likewise governed through Pluto, including a wealthy, emotional style which Aries does no longer have. both do have that horny, brash Martian potential, notwithstanding the actual undeniable reality that Scorpio is co-governed through Pluto very much distinguishes the tone from its fellow Mars-governed signal of Aries. Scorpios are severe, deepest, secretive, manipulative survivalists whom crave transformative reviews. they're stated to to be resilient, growing to be like a phoenix from the ashes. Aries, sturdy in its personal precise, is way less of a psychological signal. for sure we are purely speaking sunlight signs and indications, yet with Aries what you spot is what you get. It has more beneficial of that organic Mars potential it truly is assertive, courageous, lively, beginning and direct. Aries are more beneficial probable to potential their way through to a answer using direct skill and sheer stress of will, while Scorpio -- although also very willful -- would brood a touch more beneficial, plumbing their depths to come back to a decision on a plan of action that would take an entire city down with them. i'm speaking in hyperbole for sure, yet wish you get the concept. there is continually some thing a touch mysterious about a Scorpio, some thing stewing below the exterior even as the potential of Aries is a few thing that is worn more beneficial on the sleeve. finally, it is useful to imagine of Aries as a hearth signal -- that imaginitive, dynamic, burning potential. Scorpio is taken under consideration a water signal -- fluid, intuitive, emotional. Ram vs. Scorpion, Cardinal vs. fixed ... i ought to pass on and on :) wish that factors some thoughts.